Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
RE: MOHD MUSTAQIM MURADI
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and application details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. qualifications for admission under lpa (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. material contradictions in petitioner's forms (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. remote pupillage not valid under lpa (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. interpretation of pupillage requirements under lpa (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. confidential report and character inquiries (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. issue of pupillage period for admission (Para 26) |
| 8. provisions for admission under lpa (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. purpose of pupillage in legal training (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 10. applicability of lpa to sabah and sarawak (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 11. distinction of prior cases and current issues (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 12. discretion of bar council for exemption (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 13. court's decision on petitioner's admission (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
Introduction And Background Facts
[1] The Petitioner is a Malaysian citizen residing in Miri, Sarawak. He graduated from the Multimedia University, Malaysia with LLB Honours. He read in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
