COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BANK PERUSAHAAN KECIL DAN SEDERHANA MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
PINGGIR MERPATI SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. loan agreement and security arrangements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. disputed claims and counterclaims. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 18) |
| 3. legal obligations regarding loan repayment demands. (Para 20 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. admissibility of evidence. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 30) |
| 5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 33 , 34 , 36 , 37) |
[1] Vide an offer letter dated 12 November 2007 and a variation of terms letter dated 30 December 2008, the appellant, Bank Perusahaan Kecil dan Sederhana Malaysia, the plaintiff in the court below, ("the plaintiff") had offered facilities of a working capital loan of RM5 million to, Pinggir Merpati Sdn Bhd, the respondent and the defendant in the court below, ("the 1st defendant") to finance a construction and management project known as Kompleks Medan Selera in Shah Alam.
[2] As security for the loan, the 1st defendant entered into the following agreements:
(a) Loan Agreement - Fixed Asset dated 2 March 2009 ("P3");
(b) Deeds of Assignment (for payment of rental proceeds) dated 2 March 2009;
(c) Debenture dated 2 March 2009;
(d) Memorandum of Deposit Cum Deed of Assignment of Fixed Deposit/Mudharabah Investment A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.