INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TAN CHING WEE – Appellant
Versus
GUOCERA TILE INDUSTRIES (MERU) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural history of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. acknowledgment of evidence and documents (Para 12) |
| 4. claimant's employment background and dismissal context (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. allegations of misconduct against the claimant (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. company's position and actions regarding the claimant (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. role of the industrial court in dismissal cases (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. standards and burden of proof in dismissal cases (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. issues of impartiality and accuracy in domestic inquiry (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 10. credibility of witness testimonies (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 11. court's observations on domestic inquiry findings (Para 62 , 63) |
| 12. determining misconduct and just cause for dismissal (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 13. claimant's defense against allegations of misconduct (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91) |
| 14. analysis of gross negligence and misconduct (Para 92 , 93 |
Milan Auto Sdn Bhd v. Wong Seh Yen
Goon Kwee Phoy v. J & P Coats (M) Bhd
Ireka Construction Berhad v. Chantiravathan Subramaniam James
Stamford Executive Centre v. Dharsini Ganeson
Telekom Malaysia Kawasan Utara v. Krishnan Kutty Sanguni Nair & Anor
Metroplex Administration Sdn Bhd v. Mohamed Elias
Hong Leong Equipment Sdn Bhd v. Liew Fook Chuan & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.