SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2246

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NG KING CHONG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
OOI KIM GEIK & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:KF Wong,YF Chan ,Respondent Advocate: Goh Keng Tat,Alexavier Lee

Table of Content
1. this appeal questions the legality of a winding-up decision and the necessity of natural justice. (Para 1 , 3)
2. background facts regarding the company's management and shareholder relations. (Para 4 , 5 , 12 , 13)
3. appeal follows from the dismissal of a winding-up petition. (Para 15)
4. exploration of just and equitable grounds for winding up, drawing upon relevant legislative provisions. (Para 20 , 24)
5. jurisdiction of court in determining winding-up based on just and equitable grounds. (Para 21 , 26)

[1] This appeal emanated from the decision by the Shah Alam High Court delivered on 14 July 2017. The learned judge had dismissed the appellants' Originating Summons to, inter alia, set aside a winding-up order and to declare the liquidation of the company Nation Park Sdn Bhd ("the company") to be null and void.

[2] The learned judge had also, at the same hearing, dismissed the appellants' application in encl 5 in which an injunction was sought against the liquidator of the company, the 3rd respondent here, from carrying out the liquidation of the company until the disposal of the Originating Summons.

[3] Aggrieved with the decision, the appellants filed the instan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top