Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SIKA AG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
NIPPON PAINT (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes revolve around trademark and copyright infringement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. locus standi for trademark claims is limited to registered proprietors. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. rights of registered trademark proprietors under tma. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. invalidating trademarks requires aggrieved person status. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. definition of 'aggrieved person' in trademark law. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. defendant qualifies as an aggrieved person. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. defendant's arguments against trademark validity. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. court finds sikalatex mark valid and distinctive. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. requirements for trademark infringement claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. court finds no infringement by defendant. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. differences between sikalatex and latex 118 marks. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 12. defendant's use of latex 118 not infringing. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 13. elements of passing off claims. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 14. plaintiffs narrow focus on passing off claims. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 15. plaintiffs must establish goodwill for passing off. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 16. court finds insufficient evidence of goodwill. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
