SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 626

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HUSLI MOK – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF LANDS & SURVEYS & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nature of the land and its alienation (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. court's finding on limitation and compensation (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. interpretation of limitation and compensation under the land code (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 16 , 18)
4. construction of s 202 and its implications (Para 21 , 27)
Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal in dismissing the appellant's appeal against the decision of the High Court at Miri. The High Court allowed the respondents' application under O 33 r 2 of the Rules of the High 1980 ("RHC 1980"), wherein after determining a preliminary issue of law based on limitation, proceeded to strike out the appellant's action. The appellant was the plaintiff while the respondents were the defendants before the High Court. For convenience the parties will be referred as they were before the High Court. Leave To Appeal

[2] Leave to appeal was granted by this Court on the following two questions of law:

(1) Whether the provisions of s 202 of the Land Code of Sarawak (" ") applied to bar a claim for compensation for alleged loss of Native Customary Rights ("NCR") over

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top