COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SABAH FOREST INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the appellant's appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of judicial review procedures. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. distinction between judicial review and reference mechanism. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final judgment allowing appeal. (Para 36) |
The Appeal
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner dismissing the appellant's judicial review application on a preliminary objection of the 2nd respondent on the ground that the appellant should have, in the light of the specific provisions of s 33A of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (the IRA), challenged the Industrial Court Award (Award No 1441/2009) by way of reference to the High Court on a question of law under the said s 33A and not by way of a judicial review application under O 53 of the Rules of the High Court 1980 (the RHC).
Factual Background
[2] The 2nd respondent commenced employment with the appellant company as an Administration Superintendent on 1 August 1984. He was confirmed in that post on 20 December 1984. He was then promoted to the post of Assistant Administration Manag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.