GERARD ELIAS vs K-GE RESTAURANT SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1957

INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANG
GERARD ELIAS – Appellant
Versus
K-GE RESTAURANT SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Domnic Silvam ,Respondent Advocate: Louis Goh

Table of Content
1. reference to the industrial court. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claimant's appointment and salary details. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. claimant's allegations against the company. (Para 7)
4. company's defense against the claimant's claims. (Para 8)
5. burden of proof in dismissal cases. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. principles of constructive dismissal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. issues to determine in constructive dismissal. (Para 23)
8. evaluation of evidence and findings. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
9. delay and waiver considerations. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
10. finding of constructive dismissal. (Para 49 , 50)
11. determination of remedies. (Para 51 , 52 , 53)
12. compensation in lieu of reinstatement. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
13. final order and compensation amount. (Para 59)

Rusita Md Lazim:

[1] This is a reference from the Director General, Department of Industrial Relations Malaysia to the Industrial Court of Malaysia pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (hereinafter referred to as "the IRA ") in respect of the dismissal of Gerard A/L Elias (hereina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1957

INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANGGERARD ELIAS – AppellantVersusK-GE RESTAURANT SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANG
GERARD ELIAS – Appellant
Versus
K-GE RESTAURANT SDN BHD – Respondent