MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA TEMERLOH
AZMI ISMAIL & SATU LAGI LWN. PENDAKWA RAYA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged under wildlife conservation statutes. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. accused charged under the wildlife conservation act for possession of protected species. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. establishing prima facie case elements. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. court asserts prima facie case established via evidence of possession. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. arguments raised on legal grounds for appeal. (Para 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. appeal centered on legality and accessibility of charges. (Para 20) |
| 7. legal interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 22 , 24 , 27 , 30) |
| 8. court upholds prosecutorial discretion in charge formulation. (Para 23) |
[1] Kedua-dua perayu dituduh dengan dua pertuduhan di bawah s 68(2)(c) Akta Pemuliharaan Hidupan Liar 2010 [Akta 716] dibaca bersama s 34 Kanun Keseksaan . Di akhir perbicaraan mereka didapati bersalah terhadap kedua-dua pertuduhan tersebut dan dihukum penjara dua tahun berkuatkuasa daripada tarikh jatuh hukum 29 Mei 2017 dan denda RM300,000.00; jika tidak dibayar, enam bulan penjara bagi setiap pertuduhan.
[2] Perayu-perayu tidak berpuas hati dengan keputusan tersebut dan telah memfailkan rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman.
[3] Dalam penghakiman ini, Azmi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.