SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2155

MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA TEMERLOH
AZMI ISMAIL & SATU LAGI LWN. PENDAKWA RAYA


Petitioner Advocates:Ikmal Hisham,Noralia ,Respondent Advocate: Munirah Zainol Abidin

Table of Content
1. accused charged under wildlife conservation statutes. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. accused charged under the wildlife conservation act for possession of protected species. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. establishing prima facie case elements. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
4. court asserts prima facie case established via evidence of possession. (Para 11 , 13 , 14)
5. arguments raised on legal grounds for appeal. (Para 18 , 19 , 21)
6. appeal centered on legality and accessibility of charges. (Para 20)
7. legal interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 22 , 24 , 27 , 30)
8. court upholds prosecutorial discretion in charge formulation. (Para 23)

[1] Kedua-dua perayu dituduh dengan dua pertuduhan di bawah s 68(2)(c) Akta Pemuliharaan Hidupan Liar 2010 [Akta 716] dibaca bersama s 34 Kanun Keseksaan . Di akhir perbicaraan mereka didapati bersalah terhadap kedua-dua pertuduhan tersebut dan dihukum penjara dua tahun berkuatkuasa daripada tarikh jatuh hukum 29 Mei 2017 dan denda RM300,000.00; jika tidak dibayar, enam bulan penjara bagi setiap pertuduhan.

[2] Perayu-perayu tidak berpuas hati dengan keputusan tersebut dan telah memfailkan rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman.

[3] Dalam penghakiman ini, Azmi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top