Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
WAN JI WAN HUSSIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of appeal and reinstatement of sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts of the sedition charge. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. findings of the sessions court on prima facie case. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. defence case and denial of authorship. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. judge's conclusion on the appellant's guilt. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 6. high court's findings on appeal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. appellant's constitutional arguments and challenges. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. court's response to constitutionality of the sedition act. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. application of s 114a of the evidence act. (Para 38 , 39 , 41) |
| 10. court's rationale for sentencing decision. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by an independent speaker, Wan Ji Bin Wan Hussin ("the Appellant" or "the Accused") against the decision of the High Court which dismissed the Appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence made by the Sessions Court. At the Sessions Court, the Appellant was found guilty of the charge and convicted under s 4(1)(c) of the Sedition Act 1948 [Act 15]. The Appellant was sentenced to nine-month imprisonment from the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
