FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
IBRAHIM MOHAMAD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of charges and initial case facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial court's conviction based on possession evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. importance of proving mens rea in possession. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. question of custody and control without sufficient evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. insufficient evidence to establish knowledge of drugs. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. consideration of conduct under evidence law. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. conclusion on appeal and new sentencing. (Para 22) |
[1] Both the appellants were jointly charged before the High Court at Kota Bharu in the State of Kelantan with an offence under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act") for trafficking in 38,499.68 grammes of cannabis ("the said drug") and punishable under s 39B(2) of the same Act read with s 34 of the Penal Code . They were tried and convicted by the High Court on the charge and sentenced to death. Their appeal before the Court of Appeal was heard and subsequently dismissed. They now appeal to this Court against the decision of the Court of Appeal dismissing their appeal. Before the High Court the first appellant, Ibrahim bin Mohamad was ref
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.