Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
USAHA BAHAGIA TIMBER SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TUAN KHAIRUL ANNUAR TUAN YUSUF – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for payment of debt based on agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendant's claims on alleged coercion and misrepresentation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. explanation and analysis of coercion in relation to the agreement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. analysis of misrepresentation and its relation to the agreement. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. examination of undue influence and the burden of proof. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. court's observations on the conduct and state of affairs. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. discussion of waiver or variation of the agreement. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. finding on the enforcement of the indemnity agreement. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
Introduction
[1] The claim is for payment of a debt based on the terms of a written agreement. The counterclaim raised a host of grounds to vitiate the agreement. The case went to trial with the defendant in the main action, Tuan Khairul Annuar ("TK") accusing the 2nd defendant in the counterclaim, Sunil Bhalla ("SB") of alleged coercion, undue influence and misrepresent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
