Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GLOBAL MARITIME VENTURES BERHAD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
IZLIN ISMAIL & ORS (ENCLS 140 141 147 151 157 159 16.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for discovery details raised. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of plaintiffs' claims and related financial transactions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal framework for discovery against third parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. clarification of the bbea and discovery relationship. (Para 10 , 18) |
| 5. defendants' arguments against discovery application. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. conditions for ordering discovery against third parties. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. relevance and specificity of documents sought. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. assessment of necessity and relevance under bbea. (Para 34 , 36) |
| 9. court's dismissal of plaintiff's application. (Para 38) |
[Enclosure 140: Application for Discovery pursuant to Order 24 Rule 7A(2) Rules of Court 2012 and/or Section 7 of Bankers' Book (Evidence) Act 1949]
Background
[1] This is an Application for Discovery by the Plaintiffs against 3rd Parties (Malayan Banking Berhad & HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad) pursuant to O 24 r 7A(2) of the Rules of Court 2012 and/or s 7 of the Bankers'Book (Evidence) Act 1949 (Act 33) for the following orders:
(a) that Malayan Banking Berhad (1st Discovery Defendant) and HSBC Bank
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
