Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TIN – Appellant
Versus
HIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to case and anonymity (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background and progression of marriage (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. issues for consideration (Para 7) |
| 4. court's decision on divorce and custody (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. legal basis for spousal maintenance (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. assessment of fault in marriage breakdown (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. discretionary nature of maintenance (Para 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 8. respondent's financial independence (Para 29) |
| 9. child maintenance requirement (Para 31 , 32) |
| 10. determining appropriate child maintenance (Para 33 , 34) |
| 11. principles of joint custody (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. evolution of parental roles (Para 42 , 43 , 45) |
| 13. jurisdiction over properties (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 14. petitioner's burden of proof (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 15. final judgement and orders (Para 75 , 78) |
Introduction
[1] The Petitioner-Husband filed a divorce petition, seeking joint guardianship and custody of the child of the marriage, along with the division of matrimonial assets. In response, the Respondent-Wife cross-petitioned for sole guardianship and custody of the child, as well as child and spousal maintenance.
[2] To protect t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
