Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA TAIPING
AHMAD FARIDZ MOHD FADZIL – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of drug-related charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's trial process and legal representation (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. witness testimonies and evidence collection (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's burden of proof standards (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. judicial evaluation of witness credibility (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. impact of witness relationships on testimony (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. eligibility of confessions under law (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. criteria for proving possession of drugs (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. circumstantial evidence and witness recollection (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. legal presumptions regarding possession (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. shifting burden of proof in drug possession cases (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. appellant's defense strategy and rebuttals (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 13. principles surrounding reasonable doubt (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 14. rationale behind sentencing (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
Introduction
[1] This grounds of judgment has been prepared in respect of an appeal from the decision of this Court on 7 March 2025 by the Appellant, Ahmad Faridz Bin Mohd Fadz
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
