SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1870

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHRISTINA CAROLINA GERARDA JOHANNA VERSTAPPEN – Appellant
Versus
KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: WA-21NCvC-108-11/2020]



Petitioner Advocates:Sankara Narayanan Sankaran Nair,Narendran Letchiemanan,Wong Guo Jin ,Respondent Advocate: Nur Ezdiani Roleb,Siti Aishah Ramlan,Nuur Zul Izzati Zulkipli,Mohd Radzi Shah Abd Razak

Law enforcement must rigorously adhere to investigative protocols to fulfill the duty of care owed to the public; any negligence undermines justice and accountability.

Headnote:(A) Police Act 1967 - Section 20 - Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 107A, 112 - Investigation into suspicious death - Defendants failed to adhere to standard operating procedures and proper investigative protocols leading to misclassification of death as suicide - Premature conclusion without adequate evidence compromised investigation integrity. (Paras 39-44)

(B) Duty of Care - Law enforcement officers owe a duty to investigate with reasonable diligence; failure to act appropriately constitutes breach of duty. (Paras 40, 42)

Facts of the case:
The case arises from the suspicious death of an 18-year-old, initially classified as suicide by police without thorough investigation, leading to the plaintiff's claims against the defendants for failure in their investigative duties. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
Investigation was marred by multiple failures including premature classification as suicide, evidence tampering, and inadequate forensic analysis; resulting in a judicial finding that contradicted the defendants' initial conclusions. (Paras 19, 21, 25)

Issues: The primary issues addressed were the classification of the death, adequacy of the investigation, and subsequent failures to comply with judicial orders. (Paras 18, 21, 60)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found systemic negligence in the investigation that violated procedural requirements; the defendants' premature conclusions were unsupported and neglected to pursue significant evidence indicating foul play. (Paras 66, 68, 78)

Result: Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally, with damages awarded totaling RM1,100,000.00 and directives for a renewed investigation. (Paras 113)

Table of Content
1. case details and circumstances of the death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. plaintiff's claims regarding investigative failures. (Para 5 , 6)
3. initial police investigation findings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. critical failures in investigation process. (Para 10)
5. inquest findings and challenges to initial conclusions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. high court's judgment and its implications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. investigative efforts post-high court ruling. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. continued failures and lack of progress in investigation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
9. legal principles of duty of care and breaches. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
10. breach of statutory duty and failing to comply with obligations. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
11. malfeasance and misfeasance insights. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
12. deficiencies in investigation process. (Para 73 , 74 , 75)
13. task force effectiveness and transparency issues. (Para 76 , 77 , 78)
14. general principles regarding police discretion. (Para 82 , 83 , 84)
15. liability of the defendants and institutional failures. (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96)
16. conclusion on the systemic failures and overarching implications. (Para 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111)
17. court orders and final directives. (Para 112 , 113)
Roz Mawar Rozain J:

[1] This case arises from the tragic death of Ivana Esther Robert Smith (the Deceased), an 18-year-old Dutch national who was the biological daughter of the plaintiff. The Deceased had been living with her grandparents in Penang for 13 years before moving to Kuala Lumpur to pursue a career as a model.

[2] On 7 December 2017, the Deceased's body was discovered on the balcony of Unit 6-5 Cap Square Residences, No 2 Persiaran Cap Square, Off Jalan Dang Wangi, 50300 Kuala Lumpur at approximately 2.00pm. She was unclothed.

[3] On the same day 7 December 2017 in the evening, the plaintiff received the news of the Deceased's demise. The plaintiff immediately embarked on the journey to Kuala Lumpur to verify the tragic incident, identify the Deceased and accordingly claim her.

[4] Upon arrival on 9 December 2017, the plaintiff was asked to identify the Deceased at the morgue of Hospital Kuala Lumpur. (HKL) The plaintiff was informed by the defendants and one Sergeant Haliza that the Deceased's nude body was discovered on the balcony of Unit 6-5 Cap Square Residence and that her death was classified as suicide, with the Sudden Death Report (SDR) asserting that the cause of death was either natural or self-inflicted (suicide).

[5] This court evaluates the evidence to determine whether the plaintiff succeeds in her claims that the defendants had failed to adhere to the standard investigation procedure and/or whether there were flagrant breaches of the standard operating procedures (SOP) by the police officers involved.

[6] The plaintiff submitted that the decision that it was suicide as per the SDR showed was hastily made without conducting an initial summary investigation to properly assess the circumstances and classification of the case. The plaintiff contended that it was required that the officer in charge make an initial determination whether the death was a natural occurrence or a suspected crime based on the facts and evidence directly or indirectly available from the scene.

Initial Police Investigation

[7] Following the discovery, the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) commenced investigation. On 7 December 2017, police officers from IPD Dang Wangi, including the 2nd defendant, attended the scene. The initial investigation revealed that:

(a) The Deceased was found unclothed on the balcony of Unit 6-5 on 7 December 2017 at approximately 2.00pm;

(b) CCTV footage showed the Deceased with a man and woman which Cap Square Residence management identified as residents of Unit 20-5 of the same building several hours in the lift lobby the night before;

(c) The residents of Unit 20-5 were identified a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top