SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 2423

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GENTARI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PEMUNGUT DUTI SETEM MALAYSIA – Respondent
[Originating Summons No: WA-24-75-10-2023]



Petitioner Advocates:Jason Liang Dinghui,Ng Anlynn,Tan Weng Ying ,Respondent Advocate: Wan Hamdanie Wan Mohamad,Syed Mohd Salim Syed Abdul Hamid

A novation agreement extinguishes the original contract and creates a new one, thus not subject to ad valorem stamp duty but to a nominal duty.

Headnote:(A) Stamp Act 1949 - Sections 17 and 39(1), Item 32(a) - Assessment of stamp duty on a Novation Agreement - Court found that the assessment imposed by the Collector was not in accordance with law and cancelled it - New assessment to be made under item 4 of the First Schedule reflecting an amount of RM10.00. (Paras 1-3, 4-26)

(B) Novation - Legal concept whereby the original contract is extinguished and replaced by a new one requiring consent of all parties involved - Legal consequences differ distinctly from mere assignments or transfers of rights. (Paras 20-22)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from an assessment of RM8,220,010.00 stamp duty on a Novation Agreement concerning the transfer of rights under a shareholders' loan agreement, which was deemed incorrect by the court.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the Novation Agreement should not be classified as a conveyance on sale and is chargeable with a nominal duty instead.

Issues: Whether the stamp duty assessed under Item 32(a) for the Novation Agreement was correct, based on its nature as a novation and not a transfer of property.

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that under the Contracts Act, a novation extinguishes the original contract and creates a new one, thus impacting the application of the Stamp Act.

Result: Appeal allowed, and fresh assessment ordered.

Table of Content
1. the novation agreement and initial stamp duty assessment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. issue of ad valorem duty on the novation agreement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. definition and charging provision of stamp duty applicable. (Para 6 , 7)
4. test for determining stamp duty on instruments. (Para 8 , 9)
5. collector's argument regarding the novation agreement as conveyance. (Para 10 , 11)
6. definition of property under the stamp act. (Para 12 , 13)
7. rights and obligations related to the novation agreement. (Para 14 , 15)
8. effects of novation under contracts act. (Para 18 , 19)
9. nature of novation agreements. (Para 20 , 21)
10. collector's misunderstanding of the novation agreement's nature. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
Amarjeet Singh Serjit Singh J:

Introduction

[1] On 24 October 2024, I allowed the originating summons filed by the plaintiff, Gentari Sdn Bhd, against the assessment of stamp duty (ad valorem duty) by the Collector of Stamp Duty ("the Collector") in respect of a Novation Agreement dated 4 August 2023 ("the Novation Agreement"). The Novation Agreement was entered into between Gentari Renewables Sdn Bhd ("GRSB" previously known as Petronas Power Sdn Bhd), Petroliam Nasional Berhad ("Petronas"), and the plaintiff. The stamp duty was assessed pursuant to s 17 and item 32(a) First Schedule of the Stamp Act 1949 to the tune of RM8,220,010.00.

[2] The plaintiff had appealed against the stamp duty imposed by the Collector under s 39(1) of the Stamp Act 1949 by way of this originating summons. I had allowed the appeal as follows:

(a) the assessment of stamp duty imposed in respect of the Novation Agreement was wrong in law;

(b) the stamp duty imposed by the Collector is cancelled; and

(c) the Collector imposes a stamp duty of RM10.00 under item 4 of the First Schedule.

[3] Hereinafter, all sections or schedules referred to in this judgment refer to the Stamp Act 1949 .

Background Facts

[4] This appeal is by way of a case stated. Pursuant to the Novation Agreement, the plaintiff agreed to accept the novation and transfer of Petronas' rights, privileges, title, interest, obligations, and benefits under the shareholders' loan agreement. The consideration under the Novation Agreement is the outstanding loan amount by GRSB to Petronas under the shareholders' loan agreement, amounting to RM151,425,000.00. The Collector assessed stamp duty on an ad valorem basis under item 32(a) First Schedule. Hence, this appeal.

[5] The issue before me is whether the ad valorem duty chargeable under item 32(a) of the First Schedule on the Novation Agreement is correct.

The Law

[6] Item 32(a) of the First Schedule provides for the description of the instrument, ie, conveyance, assignment, transfer, or absolute bill of sale, and the formula to calculate the proper stamp duty, which is as follows:

"On sale of any property (except stock, shares, marketable securities, and accounts receivables or book debts of the kind mentioned in paragraph (c))"

[7] Section 4(1) is the charging provision, which provides that, subject to the Act and exemptions contained therein, the instruments specified in the First Schedule are chargeable with the stipulated duties. The assessing of the stamp duty was pursuant to s 17, which read as follows:

(1) Where any property is transferred:

(a) in consideration, wholly or in part, of any debt or of any stock or marketable security; or

(b) subject, either certainly or contingently, to the payment or transfer of any money or stock, whether being or constituting a charge or incumbrance upon the property or not, the instrument of transfer shall be chargeable with ad valorem duty calculated at the rates specified under Item 32(a) or (aa) in the First Schedule upon either the value of the debt, stock or marketable security, as the case may be, or the market value of the property as on the date of execution, whichever be the greater.

(2) Where the consideration, or any part of the consideration, for a transfer of property consists of any security other th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top