Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BOO – Appellant
Versus
YOO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the marriage and custody circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. key issues arising from custody application. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 3. court's analysis of the tender years doctrine and child's welfare. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. evaluation of evidence concerning custody suitability. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 5. determination of custody, guardianship, and access rights. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 6. final decisions on custody and maintenance obligations. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
Introduction
[1] This was an application ("this Application") filed by the Plaintiff-Wife for, inter alia, sole custody, care and control of the child of the marriage together with various ancillary prayers.
[2] Given the privacy of parties and sensitivity of issues in these proceedings, the Plaintiff-Wife and Defendant-Husband, have been anonymised in these grounds of judgment respectively as BOO and YOO respectivel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
