Back
SESSION COURT SHAH ALAM
MINSYAM SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHOO LIN (M) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. breach of tenancy and trespass. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. plaintiff argues for continued tenancy. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. defendant denies plaintiff's claims. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. court analyzed evidence and found failure of tenancy. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 5. differentiation of legal precedent. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 6. court concluded with dismissal of claims. (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
(After A Full Trial)
A. Introduction
[1] This is a case concerning breach of tenancy agreement and trespass.
B. Salient Facts Of The Case
[2] The Plaintiff, Minsyam Sdn Bhd, is a manufacturing company that produces and markets wellness products, while the Defendant, Choo Lin (M) Sdn Bhd, owns the premises in dispute.
[3] The Plaintiff and the Defendant had entered into a tenancy agreement dated 5 October 2018. The Tenancy Agreement ended on 31 March 2020.
[4] After the expiry of the tenancy agreement, the Plaintiff remained operati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
