SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3388

SESSION COURT LANGKAWI
PP – Appellant
Versus
VLADIMIR COVALENCO – Respondent
[Criminal Case No: KD-62-10-07/2024]



Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Farhan Aliff Ahmad ,Respondent Advocate: Hakim Amran

Plea bargaining agreements that involve mutual consent on sentencing terms must be honored by courts, reflecting the need for efficiency in judicial processes and accountability for child-related offenses.

Headnote:(A) Child Act 2001 (Act 611) - Section 31(1)(a); Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) - Section 172C - Charges of child abuse - Accused pleaded guilty to neglect resulting in harm to a minor, agreeing to five years imprisonment, a good behaviour bond, and community service per plea agreement. (Paras 1, 11, 51)

(B) Plea Bargaining - The court accepted plea bargaining terms mutually agreed upon by both parties, underscoring its binding nature and limits of appeal following successful plea. (Para 50)

Facts of the case:
The accused, as guardian of the child, was charged with child mistreatment, leading to physical and emotional injury to the minor, and a pattern of abuse was established, including a significant prior incident that escalated to hospital admission. (Paras 1, 15, 31)

Findings of Court:
The details of the agreement were summarized and reviewed, emphasizing the procedure undertaken for sentencing after the guilty plea was recorded. (Paras 29, 36)

Issues: Whether the plea agreement was appropriately represented in adherence to legal standards and if the sentencing reflects the gravity of the offence. (Para 13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court noted that the guilty plea, coupled with mutual agreement on penalties, served both justice and public interest concerning child protection laws amid rising cases of child abuse. (Paras 42, 43)

Result: The accused was sentenced to five years imprisonment, a two-year good behaviour bond, and required to complete community service, following the agreed terms of the plea bargain. (Paras 51, 53)

Table of Content
1. overview of charges against the accused. (Para 1 , 2)
2. application for plea bargaining initiated. (Para 3 , 4)
3. details of plea agreement and understanding. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. accused's understanding of procedures confirmed. (Para 12 , 20)
5. facts detailing the case for prosecution. (Para 15 , 16)
6. admission of exhibits supporting prosecution case. (Para 18 , 19)
7. arguments regarding sentencing and child abuse laws. (Para 21 , 24 , 25)
8. legal provisions for child abuse and sentencing. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. court’s justification in determining appropriate sentence. (Para 32 , 40 , 41)
10. consideration of public interest in sentencing. (Para 43 , 44 , 46 , 49)
11. final sentence imposed based on plea agreement. (Para 50 , 51)
Allan Suman Pillai SCJ:

Introduction

[1] Vladimir Covalenco (hereinafter referred to as the Accused) faces charges under s 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001 (Act 611). The charge alleged that, as the person responsible for the care of a female child named AF, he mistreated her, exposed her to harm, or negligently acted in a manner that could have caused her physical and emotional injury, or subjected her to circumstances that resulted in such harm through his actions.

[2] The charge levelled against the accused is detailed and set out as follows, forming the basis of the prosecution's case in this matter.

The Charge

Bahawa kamu, pada tarikh 30 Jun 2024 jam lebih kurang 8.00 pagi bertempat di Rumah No 908 Century Suria Service Apartment Mukim Kuah, di dalam daerah Langkawi, di dalam negeri Kedah Darul Aman, sebagai seorang yang mempunyai pemeliharaan terhadap seorang kanak-kanak perempuan bernama AF (No K/P: XXXXXX-XX-XXXX) telah menganiaya atau mendedahkan kanak-kanak atau bertindak secara cuai dengan cara yang mungkin akan menyebabkannya mengalami kecederaan fizikal dan emosi atau yang menyebabkan dianiaya atau didedahkan sedemikian. Oleh itu, kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah s 31(1)(a) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 31(1) akta yang sama.

[3] On 11 December 2024, after the Deputy Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the learned DPP) requested the charge to be read to the accused, the counsel representing the accused (hereinafter referred to as the learned counsel), informed the court of the accused's intention to submit an application for plea bargaining using Form 28A, as provided under s 172C of the Criminal Procedure Code ( CPC ).

[4] At the request of learned counsel for the accused, the proceedings were stood down to enable the application for admission Form 28A to be prepared and signed by the accused, for plea bargaining pursuant to s 172C of the Criminal Procedure Code ( CPC ). Pursuant thereto, the accused signed the application for plea bargaining in the Form 28A. The application for admission "Permohonan Bagi Pengakuan" Form 28A was also signed by the learned DPP and the learned counsel for the accused. (refer to Enclosure A). The specifics of this enclosure are outlined below.

"Bahawa kamu, pada tarikh 30 Jun 2024 ... boleh dihukum di bawah s 31(1) akta yang sama".

1. Saya, VLADIMIR COVALENCO (NO K/P: 690216-86-5013), dengan ini memohon kepada Mahkamah ini supaya tuduhan ditetapkan untuk perbicaraan bagi Tawaran Pengakuan berkenaan hukuman dan Pendakwa Raya hendaklah diberitahu mengenai permohonan ini.

2. Saya dengan sesungguhnya mengaku bahawa permohonan ini dibuat dengan sukarela selepas memahami jenis dan beratnya hukuman yang diperuntukkan di bawah undang-undang bagi kesalahan-kesalahan yang saya dipertuduh.

[5] The Accord and Satisfaction of Plea Offer "Penyelesaian Memuaskan Tawaran Pengakuan" was also read to the accused, who confirmed his understanding and consent by signing it. All involved parties have also endorsed the document, (refer to Enclosure B). The specifics of this enclosure are outlined below.

1. OKT mengaku salah terhadap pertuduhan di bawah s 31(1)(a) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 sepertimana pertuduhan;

2. Pihak-pihak ber

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top