Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ONG CHING CHEE & ORS – Appellant
Versus
ONG KONG BENG & ORS (ENCLS 11 13 & 14) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considered applications to strike out the claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendants challenged plaintiffs' legal standing and claims. (Para 6 , 18 , 28) |
| 3. details of plaintiffs' claims related to wound-up companies. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. legal framework for striking out claims discussed. (Para 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. plaintiffs lacked locus standi and no actionable claims. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. doctrine of res judicata prevents relitigation of same issues. (Para 40 , 41 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. claims time-barred under limitation act. (Para 54 , 56 , 61 , 63) |
Introduction
[1] There are two applications before this Court.
[2] Enclosure 11 is the Fourth Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiffs' Writ and Statement of Claim pursuant to O 18 r 19(1)(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC 2012), Item 11 of the Schedule to the Courts of Judicature Act, and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court.
[3] Enclosure 13 is the First to Third Defendants' application to strike out the Plaintiffs' Writ and Statement of Claim pursuant to O 18 r 19(1)(a), (b) and (d) of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
