Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ANG BEE LING – Appellant
Versus
NG ENG KIAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeal and context. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background and employment details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. jurisdiction of the labour office. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court satisfaction with jurisdictional determination. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. determination of employee status. (Para 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. right to transfer and good faith. (Para 20 , 24 , 33) |
| 7. viability of domestic inquiry findings. (Para 25 , 27) |
| 8. correctness of compensation calculation. (Para 28 , 36) |
| 9. natural justice and procedural fairness. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant, Ang Bee Ling, against the decision of the Director of the Labour Office dated 27 March 2023, which allowed the respondent's claim against the appellant for the sum of RM929.03.
Factual Background
[2] The respondent is a sole proprietorship audit firm that conducts audit practices on behalf of NEK & Associates. The sole proprietor of the respondent, Ng Eng Kian, is a qualified and licensed auditor in accordance with the provisions of ss 263 and 264 of the Companies Act 2016 . Mr Ng Eng Kian has his practice at No 28A, Jalan Tapah, Off Jal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
