Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA TAIPING
THANGAM PERIYASAMY & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
ALAGUKKARASAN MOHAN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. factual details surrounding the property ownership. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. plaintiffs' claims and defendants' counterclaims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. issues to be tried identified by the court. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. plaintiffs' burden of proof and allegations of fraud. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. implications of law regarding proof of fraud. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court's findings on the transfer of property and understanding. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. evaluations of contributions towards property payments. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 9. determination of the title and bona fide purchaser. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 10. conclusions drawn on various legal issues. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiffs and Defendants in this suit had filed their Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal on 8 November 2024 and 30 October 2024, respectively, against this Court's decision that was delivered on 10 October 2024 wherein the Court partly allowed the Plaintiffs' claims with costs and d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
