HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
LIM GUAN ENG – Appellant
Versus
OH TONG KEONG AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the initiation of libel suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consolidation of suits. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defamation context in press statements. (Para 9 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. identification of impugned statements. (Para 21 , 24 , 28) |
| 5. meaning and implications of statements. (Para 30 , 32 , 34) |
| 6. presumption of publication in libel. (Para 41 , 59 , 60) |
| 7. implications of defences in libel suit. (Para 115 , 119 , 120) |
| 8. responsibility of media in reporting. (Para 272 , 273 , 274) |
Prelusion
[1] The Defendant: Oh Tong Keong (OTK) is a politician. He held a press conference. He invited the media to come to his press conference. He talked about the Plaintiff (P). P is a well-known politician. A press statement about the press conference was emailed out to various persons in the media.
[2] A "China Press" journalist attended the press conference. She wrote an article about what OTK said at the press conference. It was published in both print and online forms.
[3] P sued OTK and the "China Press" for libel, for the allegedly defamatory words and statements in the press statement and the "China Press" article.
[4] Should P succeed in his cause for libel? In other words, d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.