Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TRENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties entered an agreement with specific terms. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 2. plaintiff's claims based on unlawful fund retention. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 3. plaintiff asserts cancellation negated obligations. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. defendant argues agreement terminates differently. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. cancellation of facilities impacts agreement validity. (Para 25 , 26 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. high court's interpretation on contractual cancellation effects. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. s 16.04's interpretation regarding operational clauses. (Para 35 , 36 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. contractual terms evaluation post-termination. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. events of default claims from defendant. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 58) |
| 10. commercial intent affects interpretation of clause applicability. (Para 67 , 68 , 70 , 73) |
| 11. court order favorable to plaintiff's claims. (Para 87 , 88) |
Introduction
[1] Before the court is an Originating Summons dated 3 September 2024 filed by the Plaintiff, Trenergy Infrastructure Sdn Bhd, seeking a declaration that it is entitled to all rights and interests in funds held by the Defendant, Hong
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
