Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
X DIMENSION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DATUK CHIANG HENG KIENG & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. engagement of defendant for renovation services (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 2. plaintiffs allege defects and illegality (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. defendant's position and claim for balance payment (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. sessions court findings reviewed (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. legality of contracts and registration necessity (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 6. contracts deemed void due to illegality (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. entitlement of plaintiffs to their claim despite illegality (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. conclusion and dismissal decisions (Para 57) |
A. Introduction
[1] For ease of reference, parties will be referred to as they were in the Sessions Court. The Appellant was the Defendant, whereas the Respondent was the Plaintiffs.
[2] This appeal was filed by the Defendant against part of the decision of the Sessions Court dated 29 April 2024 in the Civil Suit No: BA-A52C-35- 10/2020.
B. Brief Background
[3] On 31 May 2018, the Plaintiffs had approached the Defendant for interior design and renovation services for a project located at No 3
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
