Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
MTRUSTEE BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
TASHIMA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts of the civil suits. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. summary of judgment amounts owed. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. application for document production prior to hearing. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. consideration of jd's financial status and past acknowledgments. (Para 14 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. legal basis for jc's document requests. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. counterarguments from jd regarding document relevance. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. procedural requirements for document requests. (Para 36 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. interpretation of debtors act provisions. (Para 43 , 44 , 48) |
| 10. final ruling on appeals and decision of sar. (Para 65) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal to the Judge in Chambers against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar relating to a Judgment Debtor Summons (JDS).
[2] It concerns documents which can be ordered by the Court to be produced by the Judgment Debtor in a Judgment Debtor Summons.
[3] Parties will be referred to as the Judgment Creditor (JC) and Judgment Debtor (JD) respectively.
[4] All the above three appeals were heard together. This judgment is for all three appeals.
Background Facts
[5]
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
