COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SITI NUR AIN SULAIMAN – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS UGAMA ISLAM DAN ADAT RESAM MELAYU PAHANG & ANOR – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: C-01(NCvC)(A)-118-03/2023]
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to appeal against court's decision (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background related to the plaintiff's birth and religious status (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. decision of the learned high court judge (Para 13) |
| 4. plaintiff's arguments against islamic status (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. defendant's arguments supporting islamic status (Para 17) |
| 6. court's analysis on jurisdiction and religious status determination (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. legal analysis and interpretation of relevant sections in law (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28) |
| 8. interpretation of children's religious status and custody laws (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. constitutional interpretation relating to parental rights over children (Para 56 , 60 , 61) |
| 10. conclusion on the appeal ruling and court's position (Para 62 , 63 , 64) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the plaintiff in the court below against the decision of the High court at Kuantan in dismissing her Originating Summons for a declaration that she is not a person professing Islam. It revolves around the issue of the appellant's religious status. In her Originating Summons (the OS) dated 14 July 2022, the plaintiff sought for the following orders or reliefs:
1. a declaration that the Plaintiff is not a person professing the religion of Islam;
2. a declaration that the word "parents" in paragraph (b) in the definition of "Muslim" in s 2, Administration of Islamic Law Enactment 1991 Pahang (Enactment No 3 of 1991) (referred to as "the Enactment") only refers to the parents of a legitimate child;
3. a declaration that the plaintiff has the right to practice and profess her own spiritual and cultural belief as an aboriginal person from the Jakun tribe without any interference from the defendants; and/or
4. costs to be borne by the defendants; and/or
5. any further and/or other order this Honourable court deems fit and/or otherwise appropriate.
[2] After hearing submissions from the plaintiff and the defendants the learned High court Judge (HCJ) dismissed the OS on 22 February 2023. Dissatisfied with the said decision, the plaintiff now appeals before us seeking to reverse the decision of the learned HCJ.
[3] Both my learned brother, Justice Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali and myself decided in favour of the appellant, whilst my learned brother, Justice Wong Kian Kheong dissented. We now give our reasons for deciding so. In this judgment, the parties will be referred to as they were in the court below while the word "Islam" and "Muslim" will be used interchangeably, depending on the context.
Background Facts
[4] The background facts of this appeal can be gleaned from the affidavits filed in the High court as well as the written submissions of learned counsel herein. We would adopt the same with some modifications.
[5] The plaintiff was born out of wedlock on 27 November 1993 to one Sofiah binti Denting and Sulaiman bin Akim. The plaintiff's mother is an indigenous person of Jakun tribe. At the time of the plaintiff's birth, her mother was not a Muslim but practicing the customs and spiritual belief of the Jakun tribe. However, at that material time, the plaintiff's biological father was a Muslim. Both Sulaiman and Sofiah were never married. The plaintiff was not issued with a birth certificate.
[6] The plaintiff's mother embraced Islam on 14 November 1995. The plaintiff did not accompany her mother when the latter embraced Islam. The plaintiff was then 2 years old. The plaintiff contended that her mother embraced Islam for the purpose of marrying Sulaiman. However, this never materialized. Be that as it may, the plaintiff's mother took the Muslim name of Sofiah binti Denting and remains a Muslim. The plaintiff's mother had been issued with a Certificate of Conversion to Islam by the 1st Defendant. The plaintiff's name appeared in the Daftar Rekod Muallaf Negeri Pahang, a record kept by the 1st Defendant. In this regard, the plaintiff's mother claimed that at th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.