Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
CHAN TOH PEW & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application to transfer suit 787 allowed. (Para 1 , 2 , 60 , 61) |
| 2. background facts establish loan facility and related suits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. defendants and plaintiff's opposing arguments on transfer. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal framework for court transfer under cja and roc. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. defendants' residence satisfies transfer criteria. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. relationship of suit 787 with other pending cases. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. forum conveniens analyzed for suit 787 transfer. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41) |
| 8. benefits of consolidation of related suits outweigh specialization. (Para 40 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. independence of guarantors' liability discussed. (Para 47 , 48 , 50) |
| 10. procedural compatibility of different action types. (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 11. balanced factors favor transfer decision. (Para 58) |
Introduction
[1] Before the court is an application by the 1st and 2nd Defendants to transfer the proceedings in Kuala Lumpur High court Suit No. WA-22NCC-787-11/2024 ("Suit 787') to the Ipoh High court pursuant to O 57 r 1 of the Rules of court 2012 (" ROC ") and/or s 23 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ("CJA
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
