Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SATISH MANIAM – Appellant
Versus
SAC SAMAD YAHYA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application filed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. applicant's grounds for judicial review (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. disciplinary process compliance (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 39) |
| 4. judicial review procedure not criminal (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. sufficiency of charge details (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. assessment of exculpatory representation (Para 27 , 28 , 30 , 35) |
| 7. misjudgment on fifth charge (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. conclusion of judicial review dismissal (Para 41) |
Introduction
[1] The Applicant filed an application for a Judicial Review Proceeding (encl 13) under O 53 of the Rules of Court 2012 ( ROC ).
[2] The Applicant is seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Bahawa kebenaran diberikan kepada Pemohon yang dinamakan di atas menurut A 53 k 3 Kaedah- Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 untuk memohon suatu perintah Deklarasi dan/atau Certiorari dan/atau Mandamus dilangsungkan kepada Responden-Responden untuk memindahkan ke dalam Mahkamah Yang Mulia Ini bagi membatalkan keputusan yang telah diberi oleh SAC SAMAD BIN YAHYA, selaku Pengerusi Pihak Berkuasa Tatatertib Ibupejabat Polis Kontinjen Kuala Lumpur (Responden Pertama) dan Pihak Berkuasa Tatatertib Ibupe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
