HIGH COURT (PENANG)
QUAY CHEW SOON, J
Syafiqa Shirleyna Chan bt Abdullah – Appellant
Versus
Majlis Agama Islam Selangor & Ors – Respondent
[1]This is an application dated 17.4.2023 filed by the Applicant for leave to apply for judicial review under Order 53 Rule 3(1) of the Rules of Court 2012
[2]On 26.6.2023, I refused leave for the judicial review application. Here are the grounds of my decision.
Reliefs sought by the Applicant
[3]The Applicant seeks for the following reliefs;
(a)a declaration that the following provisions of law and each of them are contrary to and inconsistent with the Federal Constitution and are therefore null and void and of no effect:
(i)Definitions (b) to (f) of the definition of a Muslim in section 2(1) paragraph 25 of the Selangor Admin Enactment and section 2(1) paragraph 24 of the Penang Admin Enactment respectively;
(ii)Section 61(3)(b)(x) of the Selangor Admin Enactment and the Penang Admin Enactment respectively; and
(iii) Sections 74 (2) and 112 to 114 of the Selangor Admin Enactment and sections 112 to 114 of the Penang Admin Enactment respectively;
(b)an order in the nature of certiorari quashing:
(i)the decision of the Selangor Syariah Court of Appeal on 18.1.2023 in Appeal Case No. 1000-043-0071-2020; and
(ii)the decision of the Selangor Syariah High Court dated 23.7,2020 in Mai Case N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.