Back
SESSIONS COURT KUCHING
Noorhisham Mohd Jaafar, SCJ
MUHAMAD AZIZI MOHAMAD JALAI & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
EASON VOON PO YI & ANOR; ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (MA.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for intervention in ongoing litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background regarding insurance and parties involved. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal provisions governing intervention in civil suits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. burden of proof for intervention application. (Para 12 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. arguments from both parties regarding the application. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. potential legal implications and financial interest of intervener. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. necessity of including intervener to resolve matters comprehensively. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. assessment of intervention application and motives. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. timing and intent of the intervention application. (Para 29 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. subrogation rights and independent representation. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 11. delimitation of issues at the interlocutory stage. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 12. conclusion granting intervention application. (Para 41) |
Introduction
[1] The present case concerns the application by Allianz General Insurance Company (Malaysia) Berhad (the Proposed Intervener), seeking to intervene in the action commenced by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants under Civil Suit No: KCH-B53K
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
