PROVINCIAL SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT, 1887
(1) This Act may be called the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887.
(2) It extends to 1[the whole of India except 2[the territories which, immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in Part B, States,]] and
(3) It shall come into force on the first day of July, 1887.
State Amendments
Gujarat.—Same as that of Maharashtra.
[Vide Act 11 of 1960, sec. 87 and Gujarat A.L.O., 1960. The Act however ceased to apply to the City of Ahmedabad—See Gujarat Act 19 of 1961, sec. 19 (w.e.f. 4-11-1961)].
Maharashtra.—In section 1,—
(a) to sub-section (2), add the following proviso, namely:—
[Rep. partly by the Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891), sec. 2 and Sch. I and partly by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), sec. 2 and Sch.]
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect—
(a) any proceeding before or after decree in any suit instituted before the commencement of this Act; or
(b) the jurisdiction of a Magistrate under any law for the time being in force with respect to debts or other claims of a civil nature, or of Village-Munsifs or Village-Panchayats under the provisions of the Madras Code, or of Village-Munsifs under the Dekkhan Agriculturists’ Relief Act, 1879 (17 of 1879); or
(c) any local law or any special law other than the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882 (14 of 1882)1.
State Amendments
Andhra Pradesh.—In section 3, in clause (b), after the words “Madras Code” insert the words and figures “or of the laws in fo
In this Act, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context, “Court of Small Causes” means a Court of Small Causes constituted under this Act, and includes any person exercising jurisdiction under this Act in any such Court.
(1) The 1[State Government] 2[***] may, by order in writing, establish a Court of Small Causes at any place within the territories under its administration beyond the local limits for the time being of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of a High Court of Judicature established in Presidency-town.
(2) The local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes shall be such as the State Government may define, and the Court may be held at such place or places within those limits as the State Government may appoint.3
------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Provincial Government”.
2. The words “with the previous sanction of the Governor-General in Council”
When a Court of Small Causes has been established there shall be appointed, by order in writing, a Judge of the Court:
Provided that if the 2[State Government], so direct, the same person shall be the Judge of more than one such Court.]
------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for section 6.
2. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Provincial Government”.
------------------------------
(1) A Judge who is the Judge of two or more such Courts may, with the sanction of the District Court, fix the times at which he will sit in each of the Courts of which he is Judge.
(2) Notice of the times shall be published in such manner as the High Court from time to time directs.
1[(1) If the State Governments so direct, there may be appointed, by order in writing, Additional Judges of a Court of Small Causes or of two or more such courts.]
(2) 2[An Additional] Judge shall discharge such of the functions of the Judge of the Court or Courts as the Judge may assign to him, and in the discharge of those functions shall exercise the same powers as the Judge.
(3) The Judge may withdraw from 2[An Additional] Judge business pending before him.
(4) When the Judge is absent, the 3[Senior] Additional Judge may discharge all or any of the functions of the Judge.
------------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for sub-sect
[Rep. by the Government of India (Adaptation of Laws) Order, 1937].
The 1[State Government], after consultation with the High Court, may, by order in writing, direct that two Judges of Courts of Small Causes, or a Judge and an Additional Judge of a Court of Small Causes, shall sit together for the trial of such class or classes of suits or applications cognizable by a Court of Small Causes as may be described in the order.
------------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Provincial Government”.
------------------------------------
(1) If two Judges, or a Judge and an Additional Judge, sitting together under the last foregoing section differ as to a question of law or usage having the force of law, or in construing a document the construction of which may affect the merits, they shall draw up and refer, for the decision of the High Court, a statement of the facts of the case and of the point on which they differ in opinion, and the provisions of Chapter XLVI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882 (14 of 1882)1 shall apply to the reference.
(2) If they differ on any matter other than a matter specified in sub-section (1), the opinion of the Judge who is senior in respect of date of appointment as Judge of a Court of Small Causes, or, if one of them is a Additional Judge, then the opinion of the Judge sitting with him, shall prevail.
(3) For the purposes of sub-section
2[(1) There may be appointed to a Court of Small Causes an officer to be called the Registrar of the Court].
(2) Where a Registrar is appointed, he shall be the chief ministerial officer of the Court.
(3) The 3[State Government] may, by order in writing, confer upon a Registrar, within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court, the jurisdiction of a Judge of a Court of Small Causes for the trial of suits of which the value does not exceed twenty rupees.
(4) The Registrar shall try such suits cognizable by him as the Judge may, by general or special order direct.
State Amendments
Gujarat.—Same as that of Maharashtra.
[Vide Act 11 of 1960, sec. 87 and Guj
[Rep. by the Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws), 1937].
(1) The ministerial officers of a Court of Small Causes shall, in addition to any duties mentioned in this Act, or in any other enactment for the time being in force, as duties which are or may be imposed on any of them, discharge such duties of a ministerial nature as the Judge directs.
(2) The High Court may make rules consistent with this Act, and with any other enactment for the time being in force, conferring and imposing on the ministerial officers of a Court of Small Causes such powers and duties as it thinks fit, and regulating the mode in which powers and duties so conferred and imposed are to be exercised and performed.
State Amendments
Gujarat.—Same as that of Maharashtra.
[Vide Act 11 of 1960, sec. 87 and Gujarat A.L.O., 1960. The Act ho
(1) A Court of Small Causes shall not take cognizance of the suits specified in the Second Schedule as suits expected from the cognizance of a Court of Small Causes.
(2) Subject to the exceptions specified in that Schedule and to the provisions of any enactment for the time being in force, all suits of a civil nature of which the value does not exceed five hundred rupees shall be cognizable by a Court of Small Causes.
(3) Subject as aforesaid, the 1[State Government] may, by order in writing, direct that all suits of a civil nature of which the value does not exceed one thousand rupees shall be cognizable by a Court of Small Causes mentioned in the order.2
State Amendments
Bihar.—In section 15, in sub-section (2), for the words “five hundred rupees”
Save as expressly provided by this Act or by any other enactment for the time being in force, a suit cognizable by a Court of Small Causes shall not be tried by any other Court having jurisdiction within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes by which the suit is triable.
(1) 1[The procedure prescribed in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), shall save in so far as is otherwise provided by that Code or by this Act,] be the procedure followed in a Court of Small Causes, in all suits cognizable by it and in all proceedings arising out of such suits:
Provided that an applicant for an order to set aside a decree passed ex parte or for a review of judgment shall, at the time of presenting his application, either deposit in the Court the amount due from him under the decree or in pursuance of the judgment, or give 2[such security for the performance of the decree or compliance with the judgment as the Court may, on a previous application made by him in this behalf, have directed].
(2) Where a person has become liable as surety under the proviso to sub-section (1), the security may be realised in manne
(1) Suits cognizable by the Registrar under section 12, sub-sections (3) and (4), shall be tried by him, and decrees passed there in shall be executed by him, in like manner in all respects as the Judge might try the suits, and execute the decrees, respectively.
(2) The Judge may transfer to his own file, or to that of the Additional Judge if an Additional Judge has been appointed, any suit or other proceeding on the file of the Registrar.
(1) When the Judge of a Court of Small Causes is absent, and an Additional Judge has not been appointed or, having been appointed, is also absent, the Registrar may admit a plaint or return, or reject a plaint for any reason for which the Judge might return or reject it.
(2) The Judge may, of his own motion or on the application of a party return or reject a plaint which has been admitted by the Registrar, or admit a plaint which has been returned or rejected by him:
Provided that, where a party applies for the return or rejection or the admission of a plaint under this sub-section, and his application is not made at the first sitting of the Judge after the day on which the Registrar admitted, or returned or rejected, the plaint, the Judge shall dismiss the application unless the applicant satisfies him that there was sufficient cause fo
(1) If, before the date appointed for the hearing of a suit the defendant or his agent duly authorised in that behalf appears before the Registrar and admits the plaintiff’s claim, the Registrar may, if the Judge is absent, and an Additional Judge has not been appointed or, having been appointed, is also absent, pass against the defendant, upon the admission, a decree which shall have the same effect as a decree passed by the Judge.
(2) Where a decree has been passed by the Registrar under sub-section (1), the Judge may grant an application for review of judgment, and re-hear the suit, on the same conditions, on the same grounds and in the same manner as if the decree had been passed by himself.
(1) If the Judge is absent, and an Additional Judge has not been appointed or, having been appointed, is also absent, the Registrar may, subject to any instructions which he may have received from the Judge or, with respect to decrees or orders made by an Additional Judge, from the Additional Judge, make any orders in respect of applications for the execution of decrees and orders made by the Court of which he is Registrar, or sent to that Court for execution, which the Judge might make under this Act.
(2) The Judge, in the case of any decree or order with respect to the execution of which the Registrar has made an order under sub-section (1), or the Additional Judge, in the case of any such decree or order which has been made by himself and with respect to which proceedings have not been taken by the Judge under this sub-section, may, of his own motion, or on application made by a
When the Judge of a Court of Small Causes is absent and an Additional Judge has not been appointed, or, having been appointed, is also absent, the Registrar or other chief ministerial officer of the Court may exercise from time to time the power which the Court possesses of adjourning the hearing of any suit or other proceeding, and fix a day for the further hearing thereof.
(1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing portion of this Act, when the right of a plaintiff and the relief claimed by him in a Court of Small Causes depend upon the proof or disproof of a title to immovable property or other title which such a Court cannot finally determine, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings return the plaint to be presented to a Court having jurisdiction to determine the title.
(2) When a Court returns a plaint under sub-section (1), it shall comply with the provisions of the second paragraph of section 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882)1, and make such order with respect to costs as it deems just and the Court shall, for the purposes of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877 (15 of 1877)2 be deemed to have been unable to entertain the suit by reason of a cause of a nature like to that of defect of jurisdiction.
&nb
The Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 is a procedural legislation governing the establishment and functioning of Small Cause Courts in India. Section 23 of this Act addresses a crucial jurisdictional issue - it provides a mechanism for the return of plaints in suits that involve questions of title which a Small Cause Court cannot finally determine. This provision serves as a vital safeguard ensuring that complex title disputes are adjudicated by courts of competent jurisdiction rather than being summarily dealt with in Small Cause proceedings.
Section 23 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 reads as follows:
"23. Return of plaints in suits involving questions of title. — (1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing portion of this Act, when the right of a plaintiff and the relief claimed by him in a Court of Small Causes depend upon the proof or disproof of a title to immovable property or other title which such a Court cannot finally determine, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings return the plaint to be presented to a Court having jurisdiction to determine the title.
(2) When a Court returns a plaint under sub-section (1), it shall comply with the provisions of the second paragraph of section 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure and make such order with respect to costs as it deems just, and the Court shall, for the purpose of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877, be deemed to have been unable to entertain the suit by reason of a cause of a nature like to that of defect of jurisdiction."
Dependency on Title: The right of the plaintiff and the relief claimed must depend upon the proof or disproof of a title to immovable property or other title.
Court's Inability: The title in question must be one which the Small Cause Court cannot finally determine.
Discretionary Power: The court "may" at any stage return the plaint - this is discretionary, not mandatory.
Presentation to Competent Court: The plaint is to be returned for presentation to a court having jurisdiction to determine the title.
Compliance with CPC: The court must comply with the provisions of the second paragraph of section 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding return of plaints.
The scope of Section 23 encompasses the following key aspects:
Incidental Determination of Title: The Small Cause Court can decide questions of title incidentally for the purpose of deciding the main issue, but cannot finally adjudicate substantial title disputes.
Non-Ouster of Jurisdiction: Mere dispute of title raised does not automatically oust the jurisdiction of the Small Cause Court.
Discretionary Power: The power under Section 23 is discretionary and not obligatory - the court is not bound to return the plaint in every case where a title dispute is raised.
Res Judicata: Any decision on the issue of title recorded by the Small Cause Court would not operate as res judicata in a subsequent title suit.
Removal of Bar under Section 16: Once the Small Cause Court Judge exercises discretion under Section 23, the bar under Section 16 of the Act is removed, and the Civil Court is authorized to entertain the plaint.
Section 23 does not prescribe any punishment. It is a procedural provision that empowers the Small Cause Court to return the plaint when a question of title arises that the court cannot finally determine. The consequence of non-compliance with this provision is that any decree passed by the Small Cause Court on a title dispute may be liable to be set aside as being without jurisdiction.
Discretionary Power - The power under Section 23 for return of plaint is discretionary, not mandatory, and the court is not bound to return the plaint in every case where a title dispute is raised. ["Saraswati Devi VS Tabassusum Gazala - 2013 0 Supreme(All) 1533"]
Incidental Title Determination - The Small Cause Court can decide questions of title incidentally for the purpose of deciding the main issue, and such a finding is not res judicata in a suit based on title. ["Sangam Lal Yadav VS Brahm Swarup Tiwari (Since Deceased) & Others - 2012 0 Supreme(All) 2043"]
Non-Mechanical Exercise - The power under Section 23 is not to be exercised in a mechanical manner; the court must be satisfied that the relief claimed depends on proof or disproof of title that it cannot finally determine. ["RAM CHANDER VS VIth ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2304"]
Removal of Section 16 Bar - As soon as the Small Cause Court Judge exercises discretion under Section 23, the bar of Section 16 of the Act is removed, and the Civil Court is authorized to entertain the plaint as such. ["PREM SHANKER VS DISTRICT JUDGE, BAREILLY - 2017 0 Supreme(All) 1046"]
Complex Title Disputes - Where serious dispute of title has arisen, the Court of Small Causes shall not proceed with the matter but ought to return the plaint for presentation before a court competent to decide such question. ["Bhagamani Devi VS VII Additional District Judge, Vaanasi - Current Civil Cases (2011)"]
No Res Judicata Effect - Any decision on the issue of title recorded by the Small Cause Court would not operate as res judicata in a title suit before a regular civil court. ["Nirmal Jeet Singh Hoon VS Irtiza Hussain - 2010 7 Supreme 771"]
Mere Allegation Insufficient - A mere allegation in the written statement that the title vests in a defendant is not sufficient to establish that a question of title is involved in the suit. ["JAGANNATH PRASAD VS DIST. JUDGE, ALLAHABAD - 1986 0 Supreme(All) 378"]
Nature of Jurisdiction - The Small Cause Court does not possess exclusive jurisdiction; its jurisdiction is merely preferential, and it cannot adjudicate upon the issue of title finally. ["Nirmal Jeet Singh Hoon VS Irtiza Hussain - 2010 7 Supreme 771"]
Admission of Landlord-Tenant Relationship - When the tenant admits the relationship of landlord and tenant, Section 23 may not be attracted, as the court can decide the suit without finally determining title. ["MUNNI DEVI VS XTH ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AGRA - 1990 0 Supreme(All) 231"]
Substantial and Bona Fide Title Dispute - If the court itself finds that a serious, substantial, and bona fide title dispute exists, it is legally obligated to return the plaint rather than dismissing the suit on merits. ["Suresh Shah Sisodiya vs Jai Prakash Yadav - 2026 0 Supreme(All) 495"]
Striking Off Defence - Where the defendant denies the relationship of landlord and tenant and challenges title, the court cannot summarily strike off the defence for failure to deposit rent without first adjudicating the jurisdictional issue. ["Ramesh Chandra vs Rajeev Krishna - 2025 0 Supreme(All) 3972"]
Abuse of Process - Raising a plea regarding ownership where the relief claimed does not depend upon proof or disproof of title amounts to an abuse of court process and may attract costs. ["Niyamatullah and Others VS 1st Additional District Judge, Bahraich and Others - 2012 0 Supreme(All) 3149"]
Timely Payment of Rent - Default in rent payments does not excuse the tenant from liability, and the relationship of landlord and tenant remains essential despite denial of ownership. ["J.B.Motors vs Hemlata Kapoor - 2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 1796"]
Limitation Period Savings - When a court returns a plaint under Section 23, it shall be deemed to have been unable to entertain the suit for limitation purposes, protecting the plaintiff's claims. [Section 23(2)]
Exercise at Any Stage - The court may exercise its power under Section 23 "at any stage of the proceedings," but a belated application after evidence has been led may be rejected under principles analogous to res judicata. ["JAGANNATH PRASAD VS DIST. JUDGE, ALLAHABAD - 1986 0 Supreme(All) 378"]
Jurisdictional Examination - The Small Causes Court must examine its jurisdiction independently before proceeding with the suit, particularly when objections regarding jurisdiction are raised. ["Fair Growth Exports Private Ltd. VS Sanjeev Kandhari - 2016 0 Supreme(All) 3397"]
Complicated Question of Title - It is not mandatory to return plaints unless the dispute as to title is of a complicated nature; the court has discretion to try the suit where the question of title is not complicated. ["Pasarlapudi Chowltry, Pasarlapudi VS Kadali Buli Reddy - 2001 0 Supreme(AP) 1145"]
Lis Pendens - The doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 may come into play when a suit involving title is pending, but this does not automatically require return of plaint under Section 23. ["RAM CHANDER VS VIth ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2304"]
Appealability - Suits involving intricate questions of title that are returned under Section 23 become regular suits, and decrees passed therein would be appealable under Section 96 CPC, not revisable under Section 25 of the Act. ["AMAR CHAND VS MAGAN DEVI - 2012 0 Supreme(All) 238"]
Transfer of Suits - The District Court has jurisdiction to withdraw a suit or proceeding from the Court of Small Causes and transfer it to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), whereupon such transferee court is deemed to be a Court of Small Cause. ["J. C and Sons VS Ghafrana Banobi Ahmed Ali - 2007 0 Supreme(Bom) 129"]
Registration of Documents - An unregistered sale deed in respect of immovable property may be held inadmissible in evidence, but Section 23 does not oust the jurisdiction of the Small Cause Court to decide the question of title incidentally. ["SURESH VS RAM BHAROSEY LAL GUPTA - 2014 0 Supreme(All) 1579"]
Liberal Amendment - An application for amendment of written statement seeking to raise a title dispute should be dealt with liberally, but not when it is motivated solely to delay the proceedings. ["Rasheed VS Nafees Ahamad - 2016 0 Supreme(All) 3442"]
Concurrent Findings - Where there are concurrent findings of fact regarding the landlord-tenant relationship and arrears of rent, no interference under Section 23 is warranted unless there is a manifest error of law. ["RAM CHANDER VS VIth ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2304"]
Where an order specified in 1[clause (ff) or clause (h) of sub-section (1) of section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), is made by a Court of Small Causes, an appeal therefor shall lie to the District Court 2[on any ground on which an appeal from such order would lie under that section].
--------------------------------
1. Subs. by Act 9 of 1922, sec. 5, for “section 588, clause (29), of the Code of Civil Procedure”.
2. Ins. by Act 9 of 1922, sec. 5.
--------------------------------
The High Court, for the purpose of satisfying itself that a decree or order made in any case decided by a Court of Small Causes was according to law, may call for the case and pass such order with respect thereto as it thinks fit.
State Amendments
Haryana.—For section 25, substitute the following sections, namely:—
“25. Revision of decrees and orders of Courts of Small Causes.—(1) The District Judge, for the purpose of satisfying himself that a decree or order made in any case decided by a Court of Small Causes was according to law, may, of his own motion or on the application of an aggrieved party made within thirty days from the date of such decree or order, call for the case and pass such orders with respect thereto as he thinks fit.
(2) Any revi
[Rep. by the Presidency Small Cause Courts Law Amendment Act, 1888 (10 of 1888), sec. 4].
Save as provided by this Act a decree or order made under the foregoing provisions of this Act by a Court of Small Causes shall be final.
State Amendments
Sections 27A to 27R
Gujarat.—Same as that of Maharashtra.
[Vide Act 11 of 1960, sec. 88 and Gujarat A.L.O., 1960. The Act, however, ceases to apply to the City of Ahmedabad (w.e.f. 4-11-1961)—See Gujarat Act 19 of 1961, sec. 19].
Maharashtra.—After Chapter IV, insert the following new Chapter, namely:—
27A. Extent of Chapter IVA and its application.—The provisions of this Chapter extend to the areas within the local limits of the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes:
&nbs
(1) A Court of Small Causes shall be subject to the administrative control of the District Court and to the superintendence of the High Court, and shall—
(a) keep such registers, books and accounts as the High Court from time to time prescribes, and
(b) comply with such requisitions as may be made by the District Court, the High Court or the State Government for records, returns and statements in such form and manner as the authority making the requisition directs.
(2) The relation of the District Court to a Court of Small Causes, with respect to administrative control, shall be the same as that of the District Court to a Civil Court of the lowest grade competent to try an original suit of the value of five thousand rupees in that portion of the territories administered by the State Government
A Court of Small Causes shall use a seal of such form and dimensions as are prescribed by the State Government.
The 1[State Government] may, by order in writing, 2abolish a Court of Small Causes.
-----------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Provincial Government”.
2. For instance of a notification abolishing a Court of Small Causes (Broach), see Bombay Government Gazette, 1907, Pt. I, p. 339.
-----------------------------------
(1) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent 1[the appointment of] a person who is a Judge or Additional Judge of a Court of Small Causes to be also a Judge of any other 2Civil Court or to be a Magistrate of any class or to hold any other public office.
(2) When a Judge or Additional Judge is so appointed, the ministerial officers of his Court shall, subject to any rules which the 3[State Government] may make in this behalf, be deemed to be ministerial officers appointed to aid him in the discharge of the duties of the other office.
-----------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “the Local Government from appointing”.
2. For instances of notifications issued under this powers, see U.P.R. & O., Vol. I.
&nb
(1) So much of Chapters III and IV as relates to-
(a) the nature of the suits cognizable by Courts of Small Causes,
(b) the exclusion of the jurisdiction of other Courts in those suits,
(c) the practice and procedure of Courts of Small Causes,
(d) appeal from certain orders of those Courts and revision of cases decided by them, and
(e) the finality of their decrees and orders subject to such appeal and revision as are provided by this Act,
applies to Courts invested by or under any enactment for the time being in force with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes so far as regards the exercise of that jurisdiction by those Courts.
A Court invested with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes with respect to the exercise of that jurisdiction, and the same Court with respect to the exercise of its jurisdiction in suits of a civil nature which are not cognizable by a Court of Small Causes, shall, for the purposes of this Act and the [See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908)] Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882), be deemed to be different Courts.
Notwithstanding anything in the last two foregoing sections,—
(a) when, in exercise of the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes, a Court invested with that jurisdiction sends a decree for execution to itself as a Court having jurisdiction in suits of a civil nature which are not cognizable by a Court of Small Causes, or
(b) when a Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction in suits of a civil nature which are not cognizable by a Court of Small Causes, sends a decree for execution to itself as a Court invested with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes,
the documents mentioned in section 1224 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) shall not be sent with the decree unless in any case the Court, by order in writing, requires them to be sent.
&n
(1) Where a Court of Small Causes, or a Court invested with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes, has from any cause ceased to have jurisdiction with respect to any case, any proceeding in relation to the case, whether before or after decree, which, if the Court had not ceased to have jurisdiction, might have been therein, may be had in the Court which, if the suit out of which the proceeding has arisen were about to be instituted, would have jurisdiction to try the suit.
(2) Nothing in this section applies to cases from which special provision is made in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882 (14 of 1882)1, as extended to Courts of Small Causes, or in any other enactment for the time being in force.
------------------------------------
1
[Rep. by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908)].
All orders required by this Act to be made in writing by the 1[State Government] shall be published in the Official Gazette.
------------------------------------
1. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “Provincial Government”.
------------------------------------
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
AI Assistant
