Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

S.1 Short title, extent and commencement.

(1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

(2) It extends to the whole of India:

¹* * *

S.2 Definitions.

(1) In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,—

(a) "arbitration" means any arbitration whether or not administered by permanent arbitral institution;

(b) "arbitration agreement" means an agreement referred to in section 7;

(d) "arbitral tribunal" means a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators;

¹[(e) "Court" means—

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,—

(a) any written communication is deemed to have been received if it is delivered to the addressee personally or at his place of business, habitual residence or mailing address, and

(b) if none of the places referred to in clause (a) can be found after making a reasonable inquiry, a written communication is deemed to have been received if it is sent to the addressee's last known place of business, habitual residence or mailing address by registered letter or by any other means which provides a record of the attempt to deliver it.

(2) The communication is deemed to have been received on the day it is so delivered.

S.4 Waiver of right to object.

A party who knows that—

(a) any provision of this Part from which the parties may derogate, or

(b) any requirement under the arbitration agreement,

has not been complied with and yet proceeds with the arbitration without stating his objection to such non-compliance without undue delay or, if a time limit is provided for stating that objection, within that period of time, shall be deemed to have waived his right to so object.

S.5 Extent of judicial intervention.

Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by this Part, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in this Part.

S.6 Administrative assistance.

In order to facilitate the conduct of the arbitral proceedings, the parties, or the arbitral tribunal with the consent of the parties, may arrange for administrative assistance by a suitable institution or person.

S.7 Arbitration agreement.

(1) In this Part, "arbitration agreement" means an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.

(2) An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement.

(3) An arbitration agreement shall be in writing.

(4) An arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in

(a) a document signed by the parties;

(b) an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other m

S.8 Power to refer parties to arbitration where there is an arbitration agreement.

¹[(1) A judicial authority, before which an action is brought in a matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement shall, if a party to the arbitration agreement or any person claiming through or under him, so applies not later than the date of submitting his first statement on the substance of the dispute, then, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the Supreme Court or any Court, refer the parties to arbitration unless it finds that prima facie no valid arbitration agreement exists.]

(2) The application referred to in sub-section (1) shall not be entertained unless it is accompanied by the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy thereof:

²[Provided that where the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy thereof is not available with

S.9 Interim measures, etc., by Court.

¹[(1)] A party may, before or during arbitral proceedings or at any time after the making of the arbitral award but before it is enforced in accordance with section 36, apply to a court—

(i) for the appointment of a guardian for a minor or person of unsound mind for the purposes of arbitral proceedings; or

(ii) for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement;

S.10 Number of arbitrators.

(1) The parties are free to determine the number of arbitrators, provided that such number shall not be an even number.

(2) Failing the determination referred to in sub-section (1), the arbitral tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator.

S.11 Appointment of arbitrators.

(1) A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

(2) Subject to sub-section (6), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators.

(3) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), in an arbitration with three arbitrators, each party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two appointed arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator.

(4) If the appointment procedure in sub-section (3) applies and—

(a) a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty days from the receipt of a request to do so from the other party; or

S.11A Power of Central Government to amend Fourth Schedule.

¹[11A. Power of Central Government to amend Fourth Schedule.—(1) If the Central Government Government is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, amend the Fourth Schedule and thereupon the Fourth Schedule shall be deemed to have been amended accordingly.

(2) A copy of every notification proposed to be issued under sub-section (1), shall be laid in draft before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in disapproving the issue of the notification or both Houses agree in making any modification in the notification, the notification shall not be issued or, as

S.12 Grounds for challenge.

¹[(1) When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, he shall disclose in writing any circumstances,—

(a) such as the existence either direct or indirect, of any past or present relationship with or interest in any of the parties or in relation to the subject-matter in dispute, whether financial, business, professional or other kind, which is likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality; and

(b) which are likely to affect his ability to devote sufficient time to the arbitration and in particular his ability to complete the entire arbitration within a period of twelve months.

Explanation 1.—The groun

S.13 Challenge procedure.

(1) Subject to sub-section (4), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging an arbitrator.

(2) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), a party who intends to challenge an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or after becoming aware of any circumstances referred to in sub-section (3) of section 12, send a written statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal.

(3) Unless the arbitrator challenged under sub-section (2) withdraws from his office or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral tribunal shall decide on the challenge.

(4) If a challenge under any procedure agreed upon by the parties or under the procedure under su

S.14 Failure or impossibility to act.

(1) ¹[The mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate and he shall be substituted by another arbitrator, if]—

(a) he becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his functions or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay; and

(b) he withdraws from his office or the parties agree to the termination of his mandate.

(2) If a controversy remains concerning any of the grounds referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), a party may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, apply to the Court to decide on the termination of the mandate.

(3) If, under this section or sub-section (3) of section 13,

S.15 Termination of mandate and substitution of arbitrator.

(1) In addition to the circumstances referred to in section 13 or section 14, the mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate—

(a) where he withdraws from office for any reason; or

(b) by or pursuant to agreement of the parties.

(2) Where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced.

(3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where an arbitrator is replaced under sub-section (2), any hearings previously held may be repeated at the discretion of the arbitral tribunal.

S.16 Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction.

(1) The arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, including ruling on any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement, and for that purpose,—

(a) an arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the contract; and

(b) a decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not entail ipso jure the invalidity of the arbitration clause.

(2) A plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of defence; however, a party shall not be precluded from raising such a plea merely because

S.17 Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal.

¹[17. Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal.-- (1) A party may, during the arbitral proceedings ²***, apply to the arbitral tribunal--

(i) for the appointment of a guardian for a minor or person of unsound mind for the purposes of arbitral proceedings; or

(ii) for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely:--

(a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement;

The parties shall be treated with equality and each party shall be given a full opportunity to present his case.

S.19 Determination of rules of procedure.

(1) The arbitral tribunal shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872).

(2) Subject to this Part, the parties are free to agree on the procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal in conducting its proceedings.

(3) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, subject to this Part, conduct the proceedings in the manner it considers appropriate.

(4) The power of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (3) includes the power to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence.

S.20 Place of arbitration.

(1) The parties are free to agree on the place of arbitration.

(2) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), the place of arbitration shall be determined by the arbitral tribunal having regard to the circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the parties.

(3) Notwithstanding sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, meet at any place it considers appropriate for consultation among its members, for hearing witnesses, experts or the parties, or for inspection of documents, goods or other property.

S.21 Commencement of arbitral proceedings.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral proceedings in respect of a particular dispute commence on the date on which a request for that dispute to be referred to arbitration is received by the respondent.

S.22 Language.

(1) The parties are free to agree upon the language or languages to be used in the arbitral proceedings.

(2) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), the arbitral tribunal shall determine the language or languages to be used in the arbitral proceedings.

(3) The agreement or determination, unless otherwise specified, shall apply to any written statement by a party, any hearing and any arbitral award, decision or other communication by the arbitral tribunal.

(4) The arbitral tribunal may order that any documentary evidence shall be accompanied by a translation into the language or languages agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal.

S.23 Statements of claim and defence.

(1) Within the period of time agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal, the claimant shall state the facts supporting his claim, the points at issue and the relief or remedy sought, and the respondent shall state his defence in respect of these particulars, unless the parties have otherwise agreed as to the required elements of those statements.

(2) The parties may submit with their statements all documents they consider to be relevant or may add a reference to the documents or other evidence they will submit.

¹[(2A) The respondent, in support of his case, may also submit a counterclaim or plead a set-off, which shall be adjudicated upon by the arbitral tribunal, if such counterclaim or set-off falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement.]

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument, or whether the proceedings shall be conducted on the basis of documents and other materials:

Provided that the arbitral tribunal shall hold oral hearings, at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, on a request by a party, unless the parties have agreed that no oral hearing shall be held:

¹[Provided further that the arbitral tribunal shall, as far as possible, hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument on day-to-day basis, and not grant any adjournments unless sufficient cause is made out, and may impose costs including exemplary costs on the party seeking adjournment without any sufficient cause.]

S.25 Default of a party.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where, without showing sufficient cause,—

(a) the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 23, the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings;

(b) the respondent fails to communicate his statement of defence in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 23, the arbitral tribunal shall continue the proceedings without treating that failure in itself as an admission of the allegations by the claimant ¹[and shall have the discretion to treat the right of the respondent to file such statement of defence as having been forfeited].

S.26 Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal.

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may—

(a) appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal, and

(b) require a party to give the expert any relevant information or to produce, or to provide access to, any relevant documents, goods or other property for his inspection.

(2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of his written or oral report, participate in an oral hearing where the parties have the opportunity to put questions to him and to present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at

S.27 Court assistance in taking evidence.

(1) The arbitral tribunal, or a party with the approval of the arbitral tribunal, may apply to the Court for assistance in taking evidence.

(2) The application shall specify—

(a) the names and addresses of the parties and the arbitrators;

(b) the general nature of the claim and the relief sought;

(i) the name and address of any person to be heard as witness or expert witness and a statement of the subject-matter o

S.28 Rules applicable to substance of dispute.

(1) Where the place of arbitration is situate in India,—

(a) in an arbitration other than an international commercial arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in India;

(b) in international commercial arbitration,—

(i) the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the rules of law designated by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute;

(

S.29 Decision making by panel of arbitrators.

(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, in arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, any decision of the arbitral tribunal shall be made by a majority of all its members.

(2) Notwithstanding sub-section (1), if authorised by the parties or all the members of the arbitral tribunal, questions of procedure may be decided by the presiding arbitrator.

S.29A Time limit for arbitral award.

¹[29A.Time limit for arbitral award.--²[(1) The award in matters other than international commercial arbitration shall be made by the arbitral tribunal within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section (4) of section 23:

Provided that the award in the matter of international commercial arbitration may be made as expeditiously as possible and endeavor may be made to dispose of the matter within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section (4) of section 23.]

(2) If the award is made within a period of six months from the date the arbitral tribunal enters upon the reference, the arbitral tribunal shall be entitled to receive such amount of additional fees as the parties may agree.

S.29B Fast track procedure.

¹[29B. Fast track procedure.-- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the parties to an arbitration agreement, may, at any stage either before or at the time of appointment of the arbitral tribunal, agree in writing to have their dispute resolved by fast track procedure specified in sub-section (3).

(2) The parties to the arbitration agreement, while agreeing for resolution of dispute by fast track procedure, may agree that the arbitral tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator who shall be chosen by the parties.

(3) The arbitral tribunal shall follow the following procedure while conducting arbitration proceedings under sub-section (1):--

(a) The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute on

S.30 Settlement.

(1) It is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for an arbitral tribunal to encourage settlement of the dispute and, with the agreement of the parties, the arbitral tribunal may use mediation, conciliation or other procedures at any time during the arbitral proceedings to encourage settlement.

(2) If, during arbitral proceedings, the parties settle the dispute, the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings and, if requested by the parties and not objected to by the arbitral tribunal, record the settlement in the form of an arbitral award on agreed terms.

(3) An arbitral award on agreed terms shall be made in accordance with section 31 and shall state that it is an arbitral award.

(4) An arbitral award on agreed terms shall have the same status and effect

S.31 Form and contents of arbitral award.

(1) An arbitral award shall be made in writing and shall be signed by the members of the arbitral tribunal.

(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), in arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, the signatures of the majority of all the members of the arbitral tribunal shall be sufficient so long as the reason for any omitted signature is stated.

(3) The arbitral award shall state the reasons upon which it is based, unless—

(a) the parties have agreed that no reasons are to be given, or

(b) the award is an arbitral award on agreed terms under section 30.

(4) Th

S.31A Regime for costs.

¹[31A. Regime for costs.-- (1) In relation to any arbitration proceeding or a proceeding under any of the provisions of this Act pertaining to the arbitration, the Court or arbitral tribunal, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), shall have the discretion to determine--

(a) whether costs are payable by one party to another;

(b) the amount of such costs; and

Explanation.--For the purpose of this sub-section, "costs" means reasonable costs relating to--

S.32 Termination of proceedings.

(1) The arbitral proceedings shall be terminated by the final arbitral award or by an order of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (2).

(2) The arbitral tribunal shall issue an order for the termination of the arbitral proceedings where—

(a) the claimant withdraws his claim, unless the respondent objects to the order and the arbitral tribunal recognises a legitimate interest on his part in obtaining a final settlement of the dispute,

(b) the parties agree on the termination of the proceedings, or

S.35 Finality of arbitral awards.

Subject to this Part an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively.

S.36 Enforcement.

¹[36. Enforcement--(1) Where the time for making an application to set aside the arbitral award under section 34 has expired, then, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), such award shall be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), in the same manner as if it were a decree of the court.

(2) Where an application to set aside the arbitral award has been filed in the Court under section 34, the filing of such an application shall not by itself render that award unenforceable, unless the Court grants an order of stay of the operation of the said arbitral award in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3), on a separate application made for that purpose.

(3) Upon filing of an application under sub-section (2) for stay of the opera

S.37 Appealable orders.

(1) ¹[Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an appeal] shall lie from the following orders (and from no others) to the Court authorised by law to hear appeals from original decrees of the Court passing the order, namely:--

²[(a) refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8;

(b) granting or refusing to grant any measure under section 9;

(2) Appeal shall also lie to a court from an order of the arbitral tribunal--

S.38 Deposits.

(1) The arbitral tribunal may fix the amount of the deposit or supplementary deposit, as the case may be, as an advance for the costs referred to in sub-section (8) of section 31, which it expects will be incurred in respect of the claim submitted to it:

Provided that where, apart from the claim, a counter-claim has been submitted to the arbitral tribunal, it may fix separate amount of deposit for the claim and counter-claim.

(2) The deposit referred to in sub-section (1) shall be payable in equal shares by the parties: Provided that where one party fails to pay his share of the deposit, the other party may pay that share:

Provided further that where the other party also does not pay the aforesaid share in respect of the claim or the counter-claim, the arbi

S.39 Lien on arbitral award and deposits as to costs.

(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) and to any provision to the contrary in the arbitration agreement, the arbitral tribunal shall have a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the arbitration.

(2) If in any case an arbitral tribunal refuses to deliver its award except on payment of the costs demanded by it, the Court may, on an application in this behalf, order that the arbitral tribunal shall deliver the arbitral award to the applicant on payment into Court by the applicant of the costs demanded, and shall, after such inquiry, if any, as it thinks fit, further order that out of the money so paid into Court there shall be paid to the arbitral tribunal by way of costs such sum as the Court may consider reasonable and that the balance of the money, if any, shall be refunded to the applicant.

(3) An

S.40 Arbitration agreement not to be discharged by death of party thereto.

(1) An arbitration agreement shall not be discharged by the death of any party thereto either as respects the deceased or as respects any other party, but shall in such event be enforceable by or against the legal representative of the deceased.

(2) The mandate of an arbitrator shall not be terminated by the death of any party by whom he was appointed.

(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the operation of any law by virtue of which any right of action is extinguished by the death of a person.

S.41 Provisions in case of insolvency.

(1) Where it is provided by a term in a contract to which an insolvent is a party that any dispute arising thereout or in connection therewith shall be submitted to arbitration, the said term shall, if the receiver adopts the contract, be enforceable by or against him so far as it relates to any such dispute.

(2) Where a person who has been adjudged an insolvent had, before the commencement of the insolvency proceedings, become a party to an arbitration agreement, and any matter to which the agreement applies is required to be determined in connection with, or for the purposes of, the insolvency proceedings, then, if the case is one to which sub-section (1) does not apply, any other party or the receiver may apply to the judicial authority having jurisdiction in the insolvency proceedings for an order directing that the matter in question shall be submitted to arbitration in accord

S.42 Jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Part or in any other law for the time being in force, where with respect to an arbitration agreement any application under this Part has been made in a Court, that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings and all sequent applications arising out of that agreement and the arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court.

S.42A Confidentiality of information.

¹[42A. Confidentiality of information.-- Notwithstanding anything contained by any other law for the time being in force, the arbitrator, the arbitral institution and the parties to the arbitration agreement shall maintain confidentially of all arbitral proceedings except award where its disclosure is necessary for the purpose of implementation and enforcement of award.]

S.42B Protection of action taken in good faith.

¹[42B. Protection of action taken in good faith.-- No suit or other legal proceedings shall lie against the arbitrator for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder.]

S.43 Limitations.

(1) The Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), shall apply to arbitrations as it applies to proceedings in court.

(2) For the purposes of this section and the Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), an arbitration shall be deemed to have commenced on the date referred to in section 21.

(3) Where an arbitration agreement to submit future disputes to arbitration provides that any claim to which the agreement applies shall be barred unless some step to commence arbitral proceedings is taken within a time fixed by the agreement, and a dispute arises to which the agreement applies, the Court, if it is of opinion that in the circumstances of the case undue hardship would otherwise be caused, and notwithstanding that the time so fixed has expired, may on such terms, if any, as the justice of the case may require, extend the time for such period

S.43A Definitions.

S.43B Establishment and incorporation of Arbitration Council of India.

S.43C Composition of Council.

S.43D Duties and functions of Council.

S.43E Vacancies, etc., not to invalidate proceedings of Council.

S.43F Resignation of Members.

S.43G Removal of Member.

S.43H Appointment of experts and constitution of Committees thereof.57

S.43-I General norms for grading of arbitral institutions.

S.43J Norms for accreditation of arbitrators.

S.43K Depository of awards.

S.43L Power to make regulations by Council.

S.43M Chief Executive Officer.

S.44 Definition.

In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, "foreign award" means an arbitral award on differences between persons arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial under the law in force in India, made on or after the 11th day of October, 1960—

(a) in pursuance of an agreement in writing for arbitration to which the Convention set forth in the First Schedule applies, and

(b) in one of such territories as the Central Government, being satisfied that reciprocal provisions have been made may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be territories to which the said Convention applies.

S.45 Power of judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration.

Notwithstanding anything contained in Part I or in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), a judicial authority, when seized of an action in a matter in respect of which the parties have made an agreement referred to in section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him, refer the parties to arbitration, ¹[unless it prima facie finds] that the said agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.

S.46 When foreign award binding.

Any foreign award which would be enforceable under this Chapter shall be treated as binding for all purposes on the persons as between whom it was made, and may accordingly be relied on by any of those persons by way of defence, set off or otherwise in any legal proceedings in India and any references in this Chapter to enforcing a foreign award shall be construed as including references to relying on an award.

S.47 Evidence.

(1) The party applying for the enforcement of a foreign award shall, at the time of the application, produce before the court—

(a) the original award or a copy thereof, duly authenticated in the manner required by the law of the country in which it was made;

(b) the original agreement for arbitration or a duly certified copy thereof; and

(2) If the award or agreement to be produced under sub-section (1) is in a foreign language, the party seeking to enforce the award shall produce a translation into English ce

S.48 Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards.

(1) Enforcement of a foreign award may be refused, at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, only if that party furnishes to the court proof that—

(a) the parties to the agreement referred to in section 44 were, under the law applicable to them, under some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made; or

(b) the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or

S.49 Enforcement of foreign awards.

Where the Court is satisfied that the foreign award is enforceable under this Chapter, the award shall be deemed to be a decree of that Court.

S.50 Appealable orders.

(1) ¹[Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an appeal] shall lie from the order refusing to--

(a) refer the parties to arbitration under section 45;

(b) enforce a foreign award under section 48,

to the court authorised by law to hear appeals from such order.

(2) No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the Supreme Court.

S.51 Saving.

Nothing in this Chapter shall prejudice any rights which any person would have had of enforcing in India of any award or of availing himself in India of any award if this Chapter had not been enacted.

S.52 Chapter II not to apply.

Chapter II of this Part shall not apply in relation to foreign awards to which this Chapter applies.

S.53 Interpretation.

In this Chapter "foreign award" means an arbitral award on differences relating to matters considered as commercial under the law in force in India made after the 28th day of July, 1924,—

(a) in pursuance of an agreement for arbitration to which the Protocol set forth in the Second Schedule applies, and

(b) between persons of whom one is subject to the jurisdiction of some one of such Powers as the Central Government, being satisfied that reciprocal provisions have been made, may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be parties to the Convention set forth in the Third Schedule, and of whom the other is subject to the jurisdiction of some other of the Powers aforesaid, and

S.54 Power of judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration.

Notwithstanding anything contained in Part I or in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), a judicial authority, on being seized of a dispute regarding a contract made between persons to whom section 53 applies and including an arbitration agreement, whether referring to present or future differences, which is valid under that section and capable of being carried into effect, shall refer the parties on the application of either of them or any person claiming through or under him to the decision of the arbitrators and such reference shall not prejudice the competence of the judicial authority in case the agreement or the arbitration cannot proceed or becomes inoperative.

S.55 Foreign awards when binding.

S.56 Evidence.

(1) The party applying for the enforcement of a foreign award shall, at the time of application produce before the Court—

(a) the original award or a copy thereof duly authenticated in the manner required by the law of the country in which it was made;

(b) evidence proving that the award has become final; and

(c) such evidence as may be necessary to prove that the conditions mentioned in clauses (a) and (c) of sub-section (1) of section 57 are satisfied.

(2) Where any document requiring to be produced under sub-section (1) is in a foreign language, the party seeking to

S.57 Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards.

(1) In order that a foreign award may be enforceable under this Chapter, it shall be necessary that—

(a) the award has been made in pursuance of a submission to arbitration which is valid under the law applicable thereto;

(b) the subject-matter of the award is capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of India;

(c) the award has been made by the arbitral tribunal provided for in the submission to arbitration or constituted in the manner agreed upon by the parties and in conformity with the law governing the arbitration procedure;

(d) the award has be

S.58 Enforcement of foreign awards.

Where the Court is satisfied that the foreign award is enforceable under this Chapter, the award shall be deemed to be a decree of the Court.

S.59 Appealable orders.

(1) An appeal shall lie from the order refusing—

(a) to refer the parties to arbitration under section 54; and

(b) to enforce a foreign award under section 57,

to the court authorised by law to hear appeals from such order.

(2) No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the Supreme Court.

S.60 Savings.

S.61 Application and scope.

(1) Save as otherwise provided by any law for the time being in force and unless the parties have otherwise agreed, this Part shall apply to conciliation of disputes arising out of legal relationship, whether contractual or not and to all proceedings relating thereto.

(2) This Part shall not apply where by virtue of any law for the time being in force certain disputes may not be submitted to conciliation.

S.62 Commencement of conciliation proceedings.

(1) The party initiating conciliation shall send to the other party a written invitation to conciliate under this Part, briefly identifying the subject of the dispute.

(2) Conciliation proceedings, shall commence when the other party accepts in writing the invitation to conciliate.

(3) If the other party rejects the invitation, there will be no conciliation proceedings.

(4) If the party initiating conciliation does not receive a reply within thirty days from the date on which he sends the invitation, or within such other period of time as specified in the invitation, he may elect to treat this as a rejection of the invitation to conciliate and if he so elects, he shall inform in writing the other party accordingly.

S.63 Number of conciliators.

(1) There shall be one conciliator unless the parties agree that there shall be two or three conciliators.

(2) Where there is more than one conciliator, they ought, as a general rule, to act jointly.

S.64 Appointment of conciliators.

(1) Subject to sub-section (2)—

(a) in conciliation proceedings, with one conciliator, the parties may agree on the name of a sole conciliator;

(b) in conciliation proceedings with two conciliators, each party may appoint one conciliator;

(c) in conciliation proceedings with three conciliators, each party may appoint one conciliator and the parties may agree on the name of the third conciliator who shall act as the presiding conciliator.

(2) Parties may enlist the assistance of a suitable institution or person in connection with the appointment of conciliators, and in particular,—

(1) The conciliator, upon his appointment, may request each party to submit to him a brief written statement describing the general nature of the dispute and the points at issue. Each party shall send a copy of such statement to the other party.

(2) The conciliator may request each party to submit to him a further written statement of his position and the facts and grounds in support thereof, supplemented by any documents and other evidence that such party deems appropriate. The party shall send a copy of such statement, documents and other evidence to the other party.

(3) At any stage of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator may request a party to submit to him such additional information as he deems appropriate.

Explanation.—In this section and all the fo

S.66 Conciliator not bound by certain enactments.

The conciliator is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872).

S.67 Role of conciliator.

(1) The conciliator shall assist the parties in an independent and impartial manner in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute.

(2) The conciliator shall be guided by principles of objectivity, fairness and justice, giving consideration to, among other things, the rights and obligations of the parties, the usages of the trade concerned and the circumstances surrounding the dispute, including any previous business practices between the parties.

(3) The conciliator may conduct the conciliation proceedings in such a manner as he considers appropriate, taking into account the circumstances of the case, the wishes the parties may express, including any request by a party that the conciliator hear oral statements, and the need for a speedy settlement of the dispute.

In order to facilitate the conduct of the conciliation proceedings, the parties, or the conciliator with the consent of the parties, may arrange for administrative assistance by a suitable institution or person.

S.69 Communication between conciliator and parties.

(1) The conciliator may invite the parties to meet him or may communicate with them orally or in writing. He may meet or communicate with the parties together or with each of them separately.

(2) Unless the parties have agreed upon the place where meetings with the conciliator are to be held, such place shall be determined by the conciliator, after consultation with the parties, having regard to the circumstances of the conciliation proceedings.

S.70 Disclosure of information.

When the conciliator receives factual information concerning the dispute from a party, he shall disclose the substance of that information to the other party in order that the other party may have the opportunity to present any explanation which he considers appropriate:

Provided that when a party gives any information to the conciliator subject to a specific condition that it be kept confidential, the conciliator shall not disclose that information to the other party.

S.71 Co-operation of parties with conciliator.

The parties shall in good faith co-operate with the conciliator and, in particular, shall endeavour to comply with requests by the conciliator to submit written materials, provide evidence and attend meetings.

S.72 Suggestions by parties for settlement of dispute.

Each party may, on his own initiative or at the invitation of the conciliator, submit to the conciliator suggestions for the settlement of the dispute.

S.73 Settlement agreement.

(1) When it appears to the conciliator that there exist elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, he shall formulate the terms of a possible settlement and submit them to the parties for their observations. After receiving the observations of the parties, the conciliator may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement in the light of such observations.

(2) If the parties reach agreement on a settlement of the dispute, they may draw up and sign a written settlement agreement. If requested by the parties, the conciliator may draw up, or assist the parties in drawing up, the settlement agreement.

(3) When the parties sign the settlement agreement, it shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively.

(4) The con

S.74 Status and effect of settlement agreement.

The settlement agreement shall have the same status and effect as if it is an arbitral award on agreed terms on the substance of the dispute rendered by an arbitral tribunal under section 30.

S.75 Confidentiality.

Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the conciliator and the parties shall keep confidential all matters relating to the conciliation proceedings. Confidentiality shall extend also to the settlement agreement, except where its disclosure is necessary for purposes of implementation and enforcement.

S.76 Termination of conciliation proceedings.

The conciliation proceedings shall be terminated—

(a) by the signing of the settlement agreement by the parties, on the date of the agreement; or

(b) by a written declaration of the conciliator, after consultation with the parties, to the effect that further efforts at conciliation are no longer justified, on the date of the declaration; or

(c) by a written declaration of the parties addressed to the conciliator to the effect that the conciliation proceedings are terminated, on the date of the declaration; or

(d) by a written declaration of a party to the oth

S.77 Resort to arbitral or judicial proceedings.

The parties shall not initiate, during the conciliation proceedings, any arbitral or judicial proceedings in respect of a dispute that is the subject-matter of the conciliation proceedings except that a party may initiate arbitral or judicial proceedings where, in his opinion, such proceedings are necessary for preserving his rights.

S.78 Costs.

(1) Upon termination of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator shall fix the costs of the conciliation and give written notice thereof to the parties.

(2) For the purpose of sub-section (1), "costs" means reasonable costs relating to—

(a) the fee and expenses of the conciliator and witnesses requested by the conciliator with the consent of the parties;

(b) any expert advice requested by the conciliator with the consent of the parties;

(1) The conciliator may direct each party to deposit an equal amount as an advance for the costs referred to in sub-section (2) of section 78 which he expects will be incurred.

(2) During the course of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator may direct supplementary deposits in an equal amount from each party.

(3) If the required deposits under sub-sections (1) and (2) are not paid in full by both parties within thirty days, the conciliator may suspend the proceedings or may make a written declaration of termination of the proceedings to the parties, effective on the date of that declaration.

(4) Upon termination of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator shall render an accounting to the parties of the deposits received and shall return

S.80 Role of conciliator in other proceedings.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,—

(a) the conciliator shall not act as an arbitrator or as a representative or counsel of a party in any arbitral or judicial proceeding in respect of a dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings;

(b) the conciliator shall not be presented by the parties as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings.

S.81 Admissibility of evidence in other proceedings.

The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings,—

(a) views expressed or suggestions made by the other party in respect of a possible settlement of the dispute;

(b) admissions made by the other party in the course of the conciliation proceedings;

(d) the fact that the other party had indicated his willingness to accept a proposal for settlement made by the conciliator.
<

S.82 Power of High Court to make rules.

The High Court may make rules consistent with this Act as to all proceedings before the Court under this Act.

S.83 Removal of difficulties.

(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:

Provided that no such order shall made be after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of commencement of this Act.

(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each Houses of Parliament.

S.84 Power to make rules.

(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.

(2) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be, after it is made before each House of Parliament while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.

S.85 Repeal and savings.

(1) The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 (6 of 1937), the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of 1940) and the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (45 of 1961) are hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal,—

(a) the provisions of the said enactments shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced before this Act came into force unless otherwise agreed by the parties but this Act shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced on or after this Act comes into force;

(b) all rules made and notifications published, under the said enactments shall, to the extent to which they are not repugnant to this Act, be deemed respectively to have

S.86 Repeal and saving.

(1) The Arbitration and Conciliation (Third) Ordinance, 1996 (Ord. 27 of 1996) is hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any order, rule, notification or scheme made or anything done or any action taken in pursuance of any provision of the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been made, done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.

S.87 Effect of arbitral and related court proceedings commenced prior to 23rd October, 2015.

¹[87. Effect of arbitral and related court proceedings commenced.-- Unless the parties otherwise agree, the amendments made to this Act by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 shall--

(a) not apply to--

(i) arbitral proceedings commenced before the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (23rd October, 2015);

(ii) court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings irrespective of whether such court proceedings are commenced prior to or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conc

S.33 Correction and interpretation of award; additional award.

(1) Within thirty days from the receipt of the arbitral award, unless another period of time has been agreed upon by the parties—

(a) a party, with notice to the other party, may request the arbitral tribunal to correct any computation errors, any clerical or typographical errors or any other errors of a similar nature occurring in the award;

(b) if so agreed by the parties, a party, with notice to the other party, may request the arbitral tribunal to give an interpretation of a specific point or part of the award.

(2) If the arbitral tribunal considers the request made under sub-section (1) to be justified, it shall make the correction or give the interpretation within thirty days from

Legal Commentary on Section 33 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Introduction

Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a mechanism for arbitral tribunals to correct, interpret, or add to their awards within a specified period, ensuring accuracy and clarity in arbitral awards. It aims to facilitate the finality and correctness of arbitral awards while balancing the rights of parties to seek clarifications or corrections.

What Section Says

Section 33(1) permits a party to request the arbitral tribunal to correct clerical, typographical, or computational errors, or to give an interpretation of a specific point, within 30 days from the receipt of the award.
Section 33(2) empowers the tribunal to correct such errors or provide interpretations if the request is justified, within 30 days of receiving the request.
Section 33(3) prescribes a strict 30-day time limit for the tribunal to act on such requests; beyond this, the tribunal's power to correct or interpret is extinguished.
Section 33(4) allows parties to request the tribunal to make an additional award within 30 days, provided the tribunal has not already issued such an award.
Section 33(6) provides for the extension of the time limit for correction or interpretation, but only if expressly permitted or agreed upon.
Section 33(7) clarifies that no substantial modification of the award can be made under this section; only clerical, computational, or interpretative corrections are permissible.

Essential Ingredients

The request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the award.
The errors should be clerical, typographical, or computational; substantial modifications are not allowed.
The tribunal’s power is limited to correction, interpretation, or additional awards, and not to re-hearing the merits.
The request can be made by either party, but only if it is within the scope of Section 33(1).
The tribunal’s response must be within 30 days of receipt, unless extended by agreement.

Scope of Section 33

Primarily deals with minor corrections to the award, such as clerical or computational errors.
Includes interpretation of specific points of the award if requested.
Does not permit a review of the merits or substantive modifications to the award.
The limitation period is strictly 30 days from receipt, emphasizing finality.
The tribunal’s power is exercised ex parte and without re-hearing of the case.
The section is complementary to Section 34, which deals with setting aside awards.

Punishment for Section 33

Failure to act within the prescribed period results in extinguishing the tribunal’s power to correct or interpret.
Late requests or those made beyond 30 days are inadmissible.
Incorrect or substantial modifications are not permissible under this section.
Parties cannot use Section 33 as a substitute for Section 34 or as a review mechanism.
Arbitral tribunals are bound to adhere strictly to the time limits and scope prescribed.
Non-compliance can lead to finality of the award, barring further correction or interpretation.

Legal Comments (Bullet Point Summary)

Limitation - Section 33(3) prescribes a strict 30-day period for tribunal to correct or interpret the award from its receipt - [Section 33(3)]
Scope - Only clerical, typographical, or computational errors can be corrected; substantial modifications are not allowed - [Supreme Court Clarification]
Party's Right - Either party can request correction or interpretation, but only within the timeframe and scope - [Section 33(1)]
Tribunal’s Obligation - Must respond within 30 days unless extended by agreement - [Section 33(2)]
Procedure - Request must be made by notice and within the prescribed period; no re-hearing involved - [Section 33(1)]
Finality - Beyond 30 days, tribunal loses power to correct or interpret, leading to finality of the award - [Section 33(3)]
No Substantial Modification - Cannot alter the core issues or merits of the award; only clerical/corrective corrections permissible - [Supreme Court]
Arbitral Power - Limited to correction, interpretation, or additional awards; not review or re-trial - [Section 33(4)]
Extensions - Allowed only if parties agree or if the tribunal is permitted by law, but strictly within the 30-day window - [Section 33(6)]
Distinction from Section 34 - Section 33 deals with minor corrections; Section 34 involves setting aside the award on substantive grounds - [Interplay of Sections]
Judicial Discipline - Courts emphasize strict adherence to the time limits and scope of Section 33 to uphold arbitral finality - [Supreme Court]
Inherent Limitations - Section 33 does not empower courts to review the merits or substantive correctness of the award - [Supreme Court]
Inordinate Delay - Requests made after 30 days are inadmissible, leading to finality of the award - [Legal Precedents]
Procedural Rigor - The section aims to prevent delays and limit arbitral interference, ensuring certainty and finality - [Legal Principles]
Mandatory Nature - The time limits and scope are mandatory, not directory, and failure to comply results in extinction of tribunal’s power - [Supreme Court]
No Power of Review - The tribunal cannot review or modify the substantive issues under Section 33 - [Supreme Court]
Finality and Enforcement - Once the 30-day window lapses, the award becomes final and binding, with no further correction possible - [Section 33(3)]
Parties’ Consent - Extensions or waivers of time are only valid if parties agree explicitly - [Section 33(6)]
Limited Nature - The section is discretionary in nature, confined to minor corrections, and not a review mechanism - [Legal Commentary]

Conclusion

Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is a strict, procedural provision aimed at ensuring the finality and accuracy of arbitral awards through minor corrections and interpretations within a 30-day window. Its mandatory nature underscores the importance of adhering to time limits and limiting judicial or arbitral interference in the merits of the award. Courts and tribunals are bound by these provisions, which serve to streamline arbitration proceedings, uphold finality, and prevent unnecessary delays.

Note: All references are based on judicial pronouncements, statutory provisions, and authoritative legal commentaries as per the provided sources.

S.34 Application for setting aside arbitral awards.

(1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in accordance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3).

(2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the Court only if--

(a) the party making the application ¹[establishes on the basis of the record of the arbitral tribunal that]--

(i) a party was under some incapacity, or

(ii) the arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any ind

Legal Commentary on Section 34 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Introduction

Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provides the legal mechanism for challenging arbitral awards in courts. It aims to balance the finality of arbitration with judicial oversight to prevent awards that violate public policy or fundamental legal principles. The section delineates the grounds, procedure, and limitations for setting aside an arbitral award, emphasizing limited judicial intervention to uphold arbitration's efficacy and integrity.

What does Section 34 Say

Section 34 empowers a party to apply to a court for setting aside an arbitral award on specific grounds such as incapacity, invalid arbitration agreement, violation of public policy, or procedural irregularities. The application must be filed within a strict time limit of 3 months from the date of receipt of the award, with a possible extension of 30 days under certain conditions. The section also specifies the scope of judicial review, emphasizing that courts do not re-examine the merits of the award but only assess whether it conforms to the grounds specified.

Essential Ingredients

Application for setting aside: Must be filed by a party aggrieved by the award.
Timely filing: Must be within 3 months from receipt of the award, with a possible 30-day extension.
Grounds for challenge:
Incapacity of a party.
Invalid arbitration agreement.
Award contrary to public policy.
Award obtained by fraud or corruption.
Arbitrator's failure to decide on jurisdiction.
Award lacking reasons or passed without opportunity of hearing.
Limited scope: Courts do not re-appreciate evidence or merits but check for violations of legal principles or procedural fairness.
Finality: The section aims to limit judicial interference, maintaining the finality of arbitration awards unless specific grounds are established.

Scope of Section 34

Limited judicial review: Courts only examine whether the award falls under the grounds specified in Section 34.
No re-evaluation of merits: Courts do not re-assess factual findings or evidence, respecting the arbitral tribunal's expertise.
Strict adherence to time limits: The 3-month period is absolute; delays beyond are generally barred unless condoned under exceptional circumstances.
Public policy as a primary ground: An award against Indian public policy can be challenged and set aside.
Scope of challenge: Includes procedural irregularities, violations of natural justice, or awards obtained through fraud.
Restrictions on modification: Courts cannot modify or correct awards under Section 34; they can only set them aside.

Punishment for Section 34

While Section 34 itself does not prescribe punishments, courts may impose costs or dismiss frivolous or malicious applications to discourage abuse of the process. The primary consequence of a successful challenge is the setting aside of the award, which may lead to re-arbitration or litigation on the dispute.

Legal Comments

Limitation Period - The application must be filed within 3 months from receipt of the award, with a maximum extension of 30 days, making the period strictly mandatory - .
Strict Time Bar - Delay beyond the prescribed period is generally barred; courts do not have jurisdiction to condone delays exceeding 30 days unless exceptional circumstances are established - [EXECUTIVE ENGINEER VS SHAM LAL].
Scope of Judicial Review - Courts do not re-examine the merits or factual findings but only verify whether the award violates statutory provisions, natural justice, or public policy - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].
Public Policy - An award can be challenged if it is contrary to Indian public policy, which includes violations of natural justice, fraud, or awards passed without proper opportunity or reasoning - [PRITPAL SINGH VS DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ].
Grounds for Set Aside - Includes incapacity, invalid arbitration agreement, violations of principles of natural justice, corruption, or awards obtained by fraud - [N. P. C. C. LTD VS JYOTI SARUP MITTAL ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS AND Builders].
Procedural Irregularities - Arbitrator's failure to decide jurisdiction or pass awards based on sur-rejoinders filed after closure can be grounds for challenge and setting aside - [BOMBAY CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING PVT. LTD VS MEHTA FINSTOCK PVT. LTD. , MUMBAI].
Awards Without Reasons - Awards passed without reasons or passed without giving parties a fair opportunity are liable to be set aside - [PRITPAL SINGH VS DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ].
Vagueness and Uncertainty - Awards that are vague, uncertain, or fail to determine the obligations or amounts are contrary to public policy and can be set aside - [Harminder Singh Suri VS Amrik Singh Suri].
Award Against Public Policy - An award that is against Indian law, morality, or public policy, or passed without giving a fair hearing, can be challenged under Section 34 - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].
Dissenting Awards - Dissenting opinions are not considered awards under the Act; only the majority award is binding, and dissenting awards cannot be challenged under Section 34 - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].
Challenge Based on Procedural Failures - Failure to decide jurisdiction or procedural irregularities, such as non-payment of stamp duty, can be grounds for challenge and invalidation of the award - [Eider PW1 Paging Limited & Eider PW1 Communications Ltd. VS Union of India].
Limitations and Limitation Act - The limitation period for filing objections is strict; delays beyond 3 months (plus 30 days) are generally not condonable, and courts have refused to entertain belated applications - [Executive Engineer VS Shree Ram Construction Co. ].
Interplay with Limitation Act - Section 14 of the Limitation Act is generally not applicable to applications under Section 34, emphasizing the need for timely filing - [EXECUTIVE ENGINEER VS SHAM LAL].
Scope of Section 34(4) - The section allows for correction or modification of awards only on specific grounds, not re-evaluation of evidence or merits - .
Award Based on Violations of Law - Awards passed contrary to law, or without giving parties a chance to be heard, are liable to be challenged and set aside - [PRITPAL SINGH VS DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ].
Award for Interest or Damages - Awards granted without proper basis, or contrary to contractual terms, can be challenged and set aside - [MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED VS HARYANA TELECOM LIMITED].
Awards Based on Fraud or Collusion - Awards obtained through fraud, collusion, or corruption are invalid and can be challenged under Section 34 - [N. P. C. C. LTD VS JYOTI SARUP MITTAL ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS AND Builders].
No Reappraisal of Evidence - Courts do not reappreciate evidence but only verify procedural compliance and legality of the award - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].
Mandatory Nature of Stamp Duty - Failure to pay stamp duty on arbitral awards can lead to impoundment and challenge, emphasizing the importance of compliance with procedural formalities - [Eider PW1 Paging Limited & Eider PW1 Communications Ltd. VS Union of India].
Finality and Limited Review - The section emphasizes the finality of awards, with courts only examining specific legal grounds for challenge, reinforcing minimal judicial interference - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].
Legal Approach to Challenges - Courts adopt a restrictive approach, limiting challenges to violations of law, public policy, or procedural irregularities, and avoiding re-evaluation of factual disputes - [GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BSNL VS ACOME].

This concise commentary underscores the limited but crucial role of Section 34 in arbitration law, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance, timely filing, and adherence to public policy, while respecting the finality of arbitral awards.