The explosives act, 1884
(1) The Central Government 1*** may make rules consistent with this Act authorising any
officer, either by name or in virtue of his office.--
(a) to enter, inspect and examine 2[any place, aircraft, carriage or vessel] in which an
explosive is being manufactured, possessed, used, sold, 3[transported, imported or exported]
under a license granted under this Act, or in which he has reason to believe that an explosive has
been or is being manufactured, possessed, used, sold, 3[transported, imported or exported] in
contravention of this Act or of the rules made under this Act;
(b) to search for explosives therein;
(c
1[(1)] Whenever there occurs in or about, or in connection with, any
place in which an explosive is manufactured, possessed or used, or 2[any aircraft, carriage or vessel]
either conveying an explosive or on or from which an explosive is being loaded or unloaded, any
accident by explosion or by fire attended with loss of human life or serious injury to person or property, or of a description usually attended with such loss or injury, the occupier of the place, or
3[the master of the aircraft or vessel], or the person in charge of the carriage, as the case may be, shall
4[within such time and in such manner as may be by rule prescribed give notice thereof and of the
attendant loss of human life or personal injury, if any, to the 5[Chief Controller of Explosives] and] to the
officer in charge of the nearest police-station.
6*
1[9. Inquiry into accidents.--(1) Where any accident such as is referred to in section 8 occurs
in or about or in connection with 1[any place, aircraft, carriage or vessel] under the control of any
of 3[Armed Forces of the Union], an inquiry into the causes of the accident shall be held by the
naval, military, or air force authority concerned, and where any such accident occurs in any other
circumstances, the District Magistrate 4* * *shall, in cases attended by loss of human life, or may,
in any other case, hold or direct a Magistrate subordinate to him to hold, such an Inquiry.
(2) Any person holding an inquiry under this section shall have all the powers of a Magistrate in
holding an inquiry into an offence under the 5[Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)], and
may exercise such of the powers conferred on any officer
1[9A. Inquiry into more serious accidents.--(1) The Central Government may, where it is of
opinion, whether or not it has received the report of an inquiry under section 9, that an inquiry or more
formal character should be held into the causes of an accident such as is referred to in section 8, appoint
the 1[Chief Controller of Explosives] or any other competent person to hold such inquiry, and may also
appoint one or more persons possessing legal or special knowledge to act as assessors in such inquiry.
(2) Where the Central Government orders an inquiry under this section, it may also direct that any
inquiry under section 9 pending at the time shall be discontinued.
(3) The person appointed to hold an inquiry under this section shall have all the powers of a Civil
Court under the Code of Civil Proce
1[9C. Offences by companies.--(1) Whenever an offence under this Act has been committed by a
company, every person who at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, or was responsible
t6 the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed
to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any
punishment under this Act if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge and
that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this Act has been
committed by a comp
When a person is convicted of an offence punishable under this Act,
or the rules made under this Act, the court before which he is convicted may direct that the explosive, or
ingredient of the explosive, or the substance (if any) in respect of which the offence has been committed,
or any part of that explosive, ingredient or substance, shall, with the receptacles containing the same, be
forfeited.
1[11. Distress of aircraft or vessel.--Where the owner or Master of any aircraft or vessel is
adjudged under this Act to pay a fine for any offence committed with, or in relation to, that
aircraft or vessel, the. Court may, in addition to any power it may have for the purpose of
compelling payment of the fine, direct it to be levied by distress and sale of,--
(a) the aircraft and its furniture or so much of the furniture, or
(b) the vessel and the tackle, apparel and furniture of such vessel or so much of the tackle,
apparel and furniture thereof,
as is necessary for the payment of the fine.]
Whoever abets, within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code
(45 of 1860), the commission of an offence punishable under this Act, or the rules made under this Act, or
attempts to commit.. any such offence and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the
same, shall be punished as if he had committed the offence.
Whoever is
found committing any act for which he is punishable under this Act or the rules under this Act, and
which tends to cause explosion or fire in or about any place where an explosive is manufactured or
stored, or any railway or port, or any carriage, 1[aircraft or vessel], may be apprehended without a
warrant by a Police-officer, or by the occupier of, or the agent or servant of, or other person
authorised by the occupier of, that place, or by any agent or servant of, or other person authorised
by, the railway administration or 2[conservator of the port or officer in charge of the air port], and
be removed from the place where he is arrested and conveyed as soon as conveniently may be
before a Magistrate.
1[14. Saving and power to exempt.--(1) Nothing in this Act, except sections 8,9 and 9A shall apply
to the manufacture, possession, use, transport or importation of any explosive--
(a) by any of the 2[Armed Forces of the Union, and ordnance factories or other establishments of
such Forces) in accordance with rules or regulations made by 3*** the Central Government;
(b) by any person employed under 4[the Central Government or under a State Government] in
execution of this Act.
(2) The Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette exempt, absolutely or subject
to any such conditions as it may think fit to impose, 5[any
Nothing in this Act shall affect the provisions of
the 1[Arms Act, 1959 (4 of 1959)]:
Provided that an authority granting a license under th is Act for the manufacture,
possession, sale, transport or importation of an explosive may, if empowered in this
behalf by the rules under which the license is granted, direct by an order written on the
license that it shall have the effect of a like license granted under the said 2*** Arms
(4 of 1959) Act, 1959.
Nothing in this Act or the rules under
this Act shall prevent any person from being prosecuted unde r any other law for any
act or omission which constitutes an offence against this Act or those rules, or from
being liable under that other law to any other or higher punishment or penalty than that
provided by this Act or those rules:
Provided that a person shall not be punished twice for the same offence.
The
Central Government may, from time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette,
declare that any substance which appears to the Central Government to be specially
dangerous to life or property, by reason either of its explosive properties or of any
process in the manufacture thereof being liable to explosion, shall be deemed to be an
explosive within the meaning of this Act; and the provisions of this Act (subject to such
exceptions, limitations and restrictions as may be specified in the notification) shall
accordingly extend to that substance in like manner as if it were included in the
definition of the term "explosive" in this Act.
1[17A. Power to delegate.--The Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, direct that any power or function which may be exercised or
performed by it under this Act other than the power under sections 5, 6, 6A, 14 and 17
may, in relation to such matters and subject to such conditions, if any, as it may
specify in the notification, be exercised or performed also by--
(a) such officer or authority subordinate to the Central Government, or
(b) such State Government or such officer or authority subordinate to the State
Government.]
(1) An
authority making rules under this Act shall before making the rules, publish a draft of
the proposed rules for the information of persons likely to be affected thereby.
(2) The publication shall be made in such manner as th e Central Government, from
time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette prescribes.
(3) There shall be published with the draft a notice specifying a date at or after
which the draft will be taken into consideration.
(4) The authority making the rules shall receive and consider any objection or
suggestion which may be made by any person with respect to the draft before the da te
so specified.
(5) A rule made under this Act shall not take effect 1*** until it has bee
1[9B. Punishment for certain offences.--(1) Whoever, in contravention of rules made under section
5 or of the conditions of a licence granted under the said rules-- Legal Comments "Introduction" - Explosives Act, 1884, Section 9B creates liability for possession or stock of explosives in contravention of rules/licences; Section 9B is frequently invoked in conjunction with Explosives Act, Explosive Substances Act, and related regulatory regimes; caselaw across Indian courts interprets mens rea, possession, licenses, and vicarious liability in varied factual matrices [Sebastian VS State of Kerala - 1961 0 Supreme(Mad) 283], [Manafudeen VS State of Kerala - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 152], [P. Murugesan VS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Division - 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2119]. "Scope of Section" - Section 9B targets offences in contravention of licensing/possession conditions under Explosives Act; it also interacts with Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Rules under Explosives Rules, 1983/2008; courts consider whether possession without licence or violation of licence conditions constitutes an offence under 9B, and whether prosecution/forfeiture can attach depending on conviction and statutory prerequisites [Sebastian VS State of Kerala - 1961 0 Supreme(Mad) 283], [Manafudeen VS State of Kerala - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 152], [Mohd. Ishaq VS Inspector of Police - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 488], [Mohd. Ishaq VS Inspector of Police, P. S. , Osmania University - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 485]. "Mens rea / Mental element" - Courts have stressed that mens rea can be required for certain offences; but Section 9B often hinges on contravention of licence conditions, not always requiring proof of specific intent; some judgments emphasize reliance on possession with knowledge or reason to suspect genuineness of permits, while others look to the possession/licence status rather than guilty intent [Sebastian VS State of Kerala - 1961 0 Supreme(Mad) 283], [Manafudeen VS State of Kerala - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 152]. "Essential ingredients" - Core elements repeatedly posited: (i) existence of a licence/permit; (ii) alleged possession/stock/transport of explosives in contravention of rules; (iii) link to the Explosives Act/Rules; (iv) sometimes causation or intent to endanger life/property; (v) sometimes requirement of sanction/charges under accompanying Acts; (vi) in some cases, the end-user or real ownership is considered for liability [Sebastian VS State of Kerala - 1961 0 Supreme(Mad) 283], [Manafudeen VS State of Kerala - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 152], [Jose Thomas, S/O Thomas VS State Of Kerala - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 193]. "Plea on possession without licence" - Several cases hold possession of ammonium nitrate or other materials without a licence as not automatically an offence if material is not itself explosive or not in notified category; later cases reassert that certain substances become explosives upon notification or end-use context, triggering Section 9B liability; timing of notification is crucial (possession before vs after declaration) [O. Sudheer Reddy VS State, by Sub Inspector of Police, Talupula Police Station - 2010 0 Supreme(AP) 339], [V. Sekar VS State Rep. By Inspector of Police Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1687], [V. Sekar VS State Rep. By Inspector of Police Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1687]. "Possession by partnership firms / entities" - Courts have treated firms and partners with nuance: a partnership firm is not always a separate legal entity for licensing; licenses held by managing partners may suffice to enable conduct or actions on behalf of the firm; this impacts the maintenance of suits or prosecution against firms, and affects interpretation of Section 9B in corporate or partnership contexts [J & S Granites Company VS State Of Kerala - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 204], [Vizzapurupu Venkata Ramachandra Rao VS Veera Venkateswara Rao - 1957 0 Supreme(AP) 282], [P. Murugesan VS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Division - 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2119]. "Forfeiture / confiscation" - Section 10 permits confiscation of explosives or vehicles upon conviction; but courts insist that confiscation can be ordered only after conviction under Explosives Act; if conviction under 9B is not established, forfeiture orders may be reversed; procedural links require a clear basis/conviction prior to forfeiture [Mohd. Ishaq VS Inspector of Police - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 488], [Syed Zulfikar Hussain @ Syed Warish Hussain VS State Of Bihar - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 208], [Mohd. Ishaq VS Inspector of Police, P. S. , Osmania University - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 485]. "Anticipatory bail / bail context" - Courts have entertained bail under Section 439 etc. where charges involve 9B and related sections; however, bail can be denied where gravity of offence and national security concerns predominate, particularly where explosives stockpiling involves risk to life and property [AJITH KAMATH VS STATE BY VITTLA POLICE STATION - 2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 560], [Nazir Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 329]. "Cognizance and procedure" - Some judgments discuss how cognizance is taken under Section 9B and related provisions; the need for proper factual support and avoiding mechanical cognizance without adequate materials is emphasized; in some instances, orders to quash or revise cognizance are issued when evidence linking to the offence is weak [Subita Mahato VS Jagan Mahato - 2020 0 Supreme(Jhk) 190], [Dilip Patar VS State of Jharkhand - 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1237], [Kaleeswari Metal Powder VS Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Sivakasi - 2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 547]. "Sanction / prosecution validity" - Sanctions and consent for prosecution under 9B can be scrutinized; failure to obtain proper sanction may render conviction unsustainable in some cases; conversely, certain judgments hold that no separate sanction is required for certain 9B prosecutions (depending on evolving statutory interpretation) [Syed Zulfikar Hussain @ Syed Warish Hussain VS State Of Bihar - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 208], [Shah & Sons through its proprietor Jafar Shah VS Union of India through the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, New Delhi - 2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1312], [Rajender Kumar Jain: Manohar Lal: Attorney General For India VS State Through Special Police Establishment: Bansi Lal: State Of Haryana - 1980 0 Supreme(SC) 249]. "Evidence requirements" - Courts stress the need for credible evidence showing possession, relation to the accused, and chain of custody for explosives; mere suspicion or possession in a joint residence without proven exclusive control can result in acquittal or benefit of doubt; corroboration of witnesses and proper chain-of-custody requirements are focal points [Syed Zulfikar Hussain @ Syed Warish Hussain VS State Of Bihar - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 208], [Jose Thomas, S/O Thomas VS State Of Kerala - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 193]. "Liability of owners vs. tenants" - Absolute liability concepts appear in damages cases where premises owner may or may not be liable for explosions caused by tenants; high courts often separate ownership liability from tenancy or occupancy responsibility, particularly where the tenant/body in charge conducted the explosive activity; owner liability is limited unless proven control or connivance [Johny Padikala, S/o. Pandikala Anthappan VS P. C. Hassan, S/o. Chirakalaveettil Muhammed Haji - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 366]. "Public safety / licensing conditions" - Licensing authorities can impose safety-based restrictions, including location, handling, storage conditions, and sale restrictions to protect public safety; such regulatory actions can be sustained if they are reasonable, proportionate, and aligned with statutory powers; exceptions may apply where orders lack basis or exceed jurisdiction [DHEERAJ KATARIYA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2010 0 Supreme(All) 3647], [Shastri Nagar-kanchghar Sudhar Sabha VS State Of Haryana - 1996 0 Supreme(P&H) 824]. "Interplay with other statutes" - The Explosives Act interacts with Arms Act, IPC, NDPS, Environment/Water/Air Acts, etc.; many decisions hinge on whether the matter falls within the Explosives Act’s exclusive domain or engages overlapping offences under IPC; court choices reflect constitutional considerations (Article 21/14) and public interest in safety [Arijit Majumdar VS State of West Bengal - 2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1474], [Abraham Memorial Educational Trust VS C. Suresh Babu - 2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 3451], [Shastri Nagar-kanchghar Sudhar Sabha VS State Of Haryana - 1996 0 Supreme(P&H) 824]. "Remission / period of custody considerations" - Courts sometimes weigh long incarceration against rights under Article 21, especially where delay or ongoing trials interact with bail/grant of relief; however, security concerns and risk factors in explosive offences can override immediate liberty considerations in bail rulings [Nazir Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 329]. "Article 14 / equal protection concerns" - Writ petitions addressing discrimination under Article 14 arise in context of nitro-glycerine/nitro-based explosive notifications, with emphasis on burden of proof and non-discriminatory exemptions; courts require concrete, specific allegations of discrimination to intervene, and protect executive domain boundaries [UOI VS BHARAT EXPLOSIVES LTD - 2006 0 Supreme(Del) 68]. "Interpretation of 'explosive' material" - The definition/qualification of what constitutes an explosive for purposes of 9B evolves with notifications, amendments, and schedules; post-notification possession of certain materials can trigger 9B despite prior non-notification; courts examine statutory definitions and notifications closely [V. Sekar VS State Rep. By Inspector of Police Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1687], [Jose Thomas, S/O Thomas VS State Of Kerala - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 193]. "Conclusion" - Section 9B serves as a robust regulatory mechanism to deter illegal possession/stock of explosives, but its application is fact-intensive, requiring clear links to licence contravention, proper procedural safeguards, and alignment with concomitant statutes and constitutional rights; jurisprudence emphasizes exacting proof of possession/licence status, proper authority for prosecution, and careful consideration of mens rea where applicable [Sebastian VS State of Kerala - 1961 0 Supreme(Mad) 283], [Santosh Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 324], [Mohd. Ishaq VS Inspector of Police - 2011 0 Supreme(AP) 488].
(a) manufactures, imports or exports any explosive shall he punishable with imprisonment for a
term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with
both;
(b) possesses, uses, sells or transports any explosive shall be punishable with imprisonment for a
term which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to three thousand rupees or with
both; and
(c) in any other case, with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees
1[4. Definitions.--In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "aircraft" means any machine which can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions
of the air, other than the reactions of the air against the earth's surface, and includes balloons, whether
fixed or free, airships, kites, gliders and flying machines;
(b) "carriage" includes any carriage, wagon, cart, truck, vehicle or other means of conveying
goods or passengers by land, in whatever manner the same may be propelled,
(c) "District Magistrate", in relation to any area for which a Commissioner of Police has been
appointed, means the Commissioner of Police t
(1) The Central Government may, for any part
of 1[India],2*** make rules consistent with this Act to regulate or prohibit, except under and in
accordance with the conditions of a licence granted as provided by those rules, the manuf acture,
possession, use, sale. 3[transport, import and export] of explosives, or any specified class of
explosives.
(2) Rules under this section may provide for all or any of the following, among other matters, that is
to say:--
(a) the authority by which licenses may be granted;
(b) the fees to be charged for licenses, and the other sums (if any) to be paid for expenses by
applicants for licenses:
(1) Notwithstanding anything in the rules under the last foregoing
section, the Central Government may, from time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette,--
(a) prohibit, either absolutely or subject to conditions, the manufacture, possession or
importation of any explosive which is of so dangerous a character that, in the opinion of the
Central Government, it is expedient for the public safety to issue the notification. 1***.
2* * 1[6A. Prohibition of manufacture, possession, sale or transport of explosives by young persons and
certain other persons.--Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Act,--
(a) no person,--
(i) who has not completed the age of eighteen years, or
(ii) who has been sentenced on conviction of any offence involving violence or moral
turpitude for a term not less than six months, at any time during a period of five years after the
expiration of the sentence, or
1[6B. Grant of licences.--(1) Where a person makes an application for licence under
section 5, the authority prescribed in the rules made under that section for grant of licences
(hereinafter referred to in this Act as the licensing authority), after making such inquiry, if any,
as it may consider necessary, shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, by order in writing
either grant the licence or refuse to grant the same.
(2) The licensing authority shall grant a licence--
(a) where it is required for the purpose of manufacture. of explosives if the licensing
authority is satisfied that the person by whom license is required--
(
1[6C. Refusal of licences.--(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 6B, the licensing
authority shall refuse to grant a licence--
(a) where such licence is required in respect of any prohibited explosive; or
(b) where such licence is required by a person whom the licensing authority has reason to
believe--
(i) to be prohibited by this Act or by any other law for the time being in force to
manufacture, possess, sell, transport. import or export any explosi
1[6D. Licensing authority competent to impose conditions in addition to prescribed
conditions.--A licence granted under section 6B may contain in addition to prescribed
conditions such other conditions as may be considered necessary by the licensing authority in
any particular case.]
1[6E. Variation, suspension and revocation of licences.--(1) The licensing authority may vary the
conditions subject to which a licence has been granted except such of them as have been prescribed and
may for that purpose require the holder of licence by notice in writing to deliver-up the licence to it within
such time as may be specified in the notice.
(2) The licensing authority may, on the application of the holder of a licence, also vary the conditions
of the licence except such of them as have been prescribed.
(3) The licensing authority may, by order in writing, suspend a licence for such period as it thinks fit
or revoke a licence,--
(a) if the licensing authority is satisfied that the holder of the licence
1[6F. Appeals.--(1) Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority refusing to grant a
licence or varying the conditions of a licence or by an order of the licensing authority suspending or revoking a licence may prefer an appeal against that order to such authority (hereinafter referred to as the
appellate authority) and within such period as may be prescribed:
Provided that no appeal shall lie against an order made by, or under the direction of, the Central
Government.
(2) No appeal shall be admitted if it is preferred after the expiry of the period prescribed therefor:
Provided that an appeal may be admitted after the expiry of the period prescribed therefor if the
appellant satisfies the a
(1) This Act shall come into force on such day,1 as the Central Government, by
notification in the Official Gazette, appoints.
2* * *
[Repeal of portions of Act 12 of 1875.] Rep. by the Indian Ports Act, 1889 (10 of 1889), s. 2
and the Second Schedule.
(1)This Act may be called the 1*** Explosives Act, 1884; and
(2)Local extent.--It extends to whole India 2**
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.