SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 316

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.WADHWA
Coir Board, Ernakulam, Cochin – Appellant
Versus
Indira Devi P. S – Respondent


Judgment

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-In these appeals from a judgment of the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court, we have to examine whether the appellant-Coir Board is an industry as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The appellant-Coir Board, Ernakulam, Cochin, has been set up under the Coir Industry Act, 1953. In the Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Act, it is stated “(1) The Coir Industry has definite role to play in our national economy. It is of very great economic importance to Travancore Cochin where it is concentrated and also, from the point of view of earning foreign exchange, of impor­tance to the whole country. It has, however, been passing through acute depression since the middle of 1952 as a result of the marked decline in exports. With a view to controlling production, improving its quality, weeding out the undesirable elements in the export trade and developing the internal market so as to reduce the industry’s dependence on exports, it is considered necessary to establish a Statutory Board on the lines of Boards set up for other plantation industries.

2. In order to finance the development of this industry it is proposed that a duty up to Re. 1/-



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top