S. RAJENDRA BABU, R. C. LAHOTI, A. S. ANAND
R. P. Moidutty – Appellant
Versus
P. T. Kunju Mohammad – Respondent
Judgment
R.C. Lahoti, J.-This appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter, the Act, for short) has been preferred by the candidate who lost at the election and also in the election petition challenging the election of respondent No. 1, who had succeeded at the polls.
2. Election to the 65 - Guruvayur Legislative Assembly constituency in Kerala was held on 27.4.1996. The appellant contested the election on the symbol of ‘ladder’ of the Muslim League Party with the support of the United Democratic Front. The respondent No. 1 was an independent candidate supported by the Left Democratic Front owing allegiance to Communist Party of India (Marxist). There were seven other contesting candidates also. The result was declared on 8.5.1996. The real contest was between the appellant and the respondent No. 1. The appellant secured 37034 votes. Respondent No. 1 secured 39870 votes. Thus the respondent No. 1 succeeded by a margin of 2836 votes over the appellant.
3. According to the petitioner (appellant herein) the result of the election was materially affected and vitiated by the commission of corrupt practice within the meaning of Sub Sections (3) and (
Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh
Rahim Khan v. Khurshid Ahmed & Ors.
Bir Chandra Barman v. Shri Anil Sarkar & Ors.
Lakshmi Raman Acharya v. Chandan Singh & Ors.
Amolak Chand Chhazad v. Bhagwandas Arya (Dead) & Anr.
F.A. Sapa etc. etc. v. Singora & Ors. etc.
Murarka Radhey Sham Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.