SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1095

R. C. LAHOTI, S. RAJENDRA BABU, A. S. ANAND
Chandra Kishore Jha – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. A.S. Anand, CJI.-Election of Respondent No. 1 to the Bihar Legis­lative Assembly from 86, Ghanshyampur Assembly Constituency, held in March, 1995, was challenged by the appellant through an Election Petition on various grounds. The Election Petition was resisted by the returned candidate and certain preliminary objections were also raised. The returned candidate on 14.8.1997 filed an application under Section 81(1) read with Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter the Act) in the High Court of Patna seeking dismissal of the election petition, on the ground that the petition presented on 17.5.1995 was beyond the period of limitation and thus liable to be dismissed under Section 86 of the Act. The application was decided in favour of the returned candidate and the learned desig­nated election Judge vide order dated 3rd October, 1997 dismissed the election petition, without trial, as barred by limitation. Aggrieved, the appellant is before us.

2. The only issue debated before us centers around the non-filing of the election petition within the prescribed period of 45 days from the date of election. Reference to some dates, which are not in disp














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top