SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 746

A. S. ANAND, R. C. LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
Madhukar – Appellant
Versus
Sangram – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Respondents - plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration that they, along with defendant No. 1, were the joint owners in possession of the suit property and also for a declaration that gift deed bearing No. 3041/65 and the two sale deeds dated 28.2.1989 were ineffective insofar as the rights of the plaintiffs are concerned. Suit was dismissed by the Trial Court. A perusal of the order of the Trial Court shows that suit was dismissed inter-alia on the ground (1) of limitation and (2) on the ground that decision in an earlier suit, being OS No. 93/71 operated as res judicata against defendant No.1 only. Before the Trial Court, documentary evidence was led, including placing on record copies of entries of public records and decision of the earlier suit (O.S. No. 93/71).

3. Against the dismissal of the suit, a first appeal was filed by the plaintiffs - respondents in the High Court. The High Court, after noticing some details from the judgment of the Trial Court as also pleadings of the parties, opined that the questions to be decided in the appeal were :

"(1) Whether the relationship claimed by the parties are true?

(2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top