SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 132

R. C. LAHOTI, A. S. ANAND, DORAISWAMY RAJU
M. Abbas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

The appellant, at the relevant time, was serving as an overseer with Nedumangad Municipality. PW-2 Sasidharan Nair was a contractor with the Municipality. According to the prosecution case, the appellant demanded a sum of Rs. 200/- as bribe from PW-2 for refunding earnest money and security deposit amounting to Rs. 500/-, which had been deposited at the time of submission of tender for maintenance work of Poovathoor road, which work was completed by the contractor, PW-2 by 12.7.1984. PW-2 submitted a bill for Rs.10,000/-. He was, however, paid Rs. 8706.12 only after measurements were taken. On 28th August, 1984, PW-2 applied for release of earnest money and security deposit. His application was referred to the appellant for report. It is at the point of time on 18th October, 1984 that, it is alleged, appellant demanded Rs. 200 as bribe from PW-2 for processing his refund application. It is further alleged by the prosecution that on 19th October, 1984, PW-2 paid Rs.50/- to the appellant and left after promising to pay the balance amount of Rs. 150/-. PW-2, then made a complaint (Ext. P-6) at the headquarter of Vigilance Wing. The complaint was recorded by Dy. S.P., A. Thanka















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top