SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 937

National Insurance Company LTD. , Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Nicolletta Rohtagi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. K. Khare, J.-Leave granted.

2. The short question that arises for our consideration in this group of appeals is where an insured has not preferred an appeal under Section 173 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 1988 Act ) against an award given by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal ), is it open to the insurer to prefer an appeal against the award by the Tribunal questioning the quantum of the compensation, as well as finding as regards the negligence of the offending vehicle .

3. Before we proceed further, it is necessary to set out brief facts of the cases, which have given rise to the aforesaid question.

4. In Civil Appeal No. 5911 /2002 @ S.L.P. (Civil) No. 9238/2000, the appellant was grievously injured in a motor vehicle accident on 29.5.1993. He preferred a claim petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal granted a compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,50,415/- against the insurer and the insured jointly. The insurer was directed to deposit the decretal amount. The insured did not file any appeal. On appeal being filed by the insurer, the High Court reduced the compensation to Rs. 84,375/-. In this appe













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top