SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 598

V. N. KHARE, S. B. SINHA, A. R. LAKSHMANAN
Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (D) by Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
B. D. Agarwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.-Whether settlement of a private dispute between the parties to a writ proceeding is permissible in law, is the prime question involved in these batch of appeals which arise out of judgments and orders passed by Madhya Pradesh High Court in M.P.No. 802 of 1992 and M.C.C. No. 477 of 1992 and the connected writ petition.

2. The factual matrix involved in these matters may be noticed in brief.

A partnership firm known as M/s. Dwarka Prasad Agarwal & Brothers (The firm) was constituted with Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (since deceased), Bishambhar Dayal Agarwal (since deceased), Mahesh Prasad Aggarwal - all sons of Keshav Dev Agarwal and Ramesh Chandra Agarwal, son of Dwarka Prasad Agarwal in the year 1972 as partners thereof. Each partner contributed towards the capital of the Firm in shares to the extent of 25 , 30 , 30 and 15 respectively. Prior to the constitution of the Firm, a newspaper known as Dainik Bhaskar was being published by Dwarka Prasad Agarwal and his name was recorded in the Registrar of Newspapers for India (for short RNI ). The said Dwarka Prasad Agarwal was the karta of a larger HUF consisting of himself and his partners. He had two wives, namely,






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top