S. B. SINHA
Pure Helium India Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Oil And Natural Gas Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.-Whether jurisdiction of an arbitrator to interpret a contract can be subject-matter of an objection under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 [hereinafter referred to as the Act , for the sake of brevity) is in question in this appeal which arises out of the judgment and order dated 24.2.2000 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. 612 of 1996 arising out of a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 13.10.1995 dismissing the said objection of the respondent.
Background Fact :
2. The parties hereto entered into a contract for supply of Helium Diving Gas pursuant to a notice inviting global tender dated 2.5.1989. In terms of the said notice inviting tender, the respondent herein was to take supply of Helium gas, which is one of the rare gases being not chemically produced and is mainly extracted from the natural gas wells in mineral form. The said gas is ordinarily imported from U.S.A., Alegeria, Poland and Russia. In terms of the said notice inviting tender, three different categories of rates were to be quoted by the tenderers both foreign and Indian. Whereas the foreign tenderers were to quote their prices in foreign currency,
W.B. State Warehousing Corporation and Another v. Sushil Kumar Kayan and Others
K.R. Raveendranathan v. State of Kerala
P.V. Subba Naidu and Others v. Government of A.P. and Others
H.P. State Electricity Board v. R.J. Shah and Company
Shyama Charan Agarwala & Sons etc. v. Union of India etc.
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. v. Eastern Engineeering Enterprises and Another
Food Corporation of India v. Surendra, Devendra & Mahendra Transport Co.
Khardah Company Ltd. v. Raymon & Co. (India) Private Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.