SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(SC) 36

S. R. DASS, B. K. MUKHERJEE, H. J. KANIA, M. C. MAHAJAN, N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR
Chintaman Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.H.Joshi, P.A.Mehta, RAJINDAR NARAIN, S.M.Sikri

Judgment

Mahajan., J. :- These two petns. for enforcement of the fundamental right guaranteed under Art.19 (1) (g), Const. Ind. have been made by a proprietor & an employee respectively of a bidi manufacturing concern of District Sagar (State of Madhya Pradesh). It is contended that the law in force in the State authorising it to prohibit the manufacture of bidis in certain villages including the ones wherein the aspects reside is inconsistent with the provisions of Part III of the Constitution & is consequently void.

2. The Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidis (Agricultural Purposes) Act, LXIV [64] of 1948 was passed on 19-10-1948 & was the law in force in the State at the commencement of the Constitution. Sections 3 & 4 of the Act are in these terms : "

3. The Deputy Commissioner may by notification fix a period to be an agricultural season with respect to such villages as may be specified therein.

4. (1) The Deputy Commissioner may, by general order which shall extend to such villages as he may specify, prohibit the manufacture of bidis during the agricultural season. (2). No person residing in a village specified in such order shall during the agricultu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top