S. K. DAS, VIVIAN BOSE, S. R. DASS, A. K. SARKAR, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Purshotam Lal Dhingra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
S. R. DAS, CJI. : This appeal has been filed with a certificate of fitness granted by the Punjab High Court on August 20, 1956. It is directed against the 39 judgment and order passed by a Division Bench of that Court on January 19, 1956, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 28 of 1955, reversing the judgment and order of Mr. Justice Harnam Singh pronounced on April 15, 1955, whereby his Lordship had allowed the appellant s application being Civil Writ No. 36-D of 1955 and set aside the order passed by the General Manager, Northern Railway on August 19, 1953, reverting the petitioner from the post of Signal and Tele-communication Engineer, (Telegraphs) in Class II service where the appellant was officiating to his substantive post in Class III service. This appeal raises a very important question about the construction of Art. 311 of the Constitution.
2. The facts are shortly as follows:- In August 1924 the appellant joined the railway service as a Signaller (Telegraphist). As a result of selection, he was promoted as Section Controller in 1942 and as Deputy Chief Controller in 1947 and as the Chief Controller in 1950. All these posts were in Class III service. On March 31, 1951, se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.