SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 204

I. D. DUA, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S. M. SIKRI
Chajoo Ram – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

What is the standard for initiating prosecution for perjury under Section 476 read with Section 479-A, Cr.P.C. in cases involving false affidavits in election/official proceedings? What factors should be considered to determine the expediency of filing a complaint for perjury in a case where long delays and conflicting documentary evidence exist? What is the effect of Section 479-A, Cr.P.C. on proceedings under Sections 476 to 479 when the alleged false evidence was not given as a witness in court?

What is the standard for initiating prosecution for perjury under Section 476 read with Section 479-A, Cr.P.C. in cases involving false affidavits in election/official proceedings?

What factors should be considered to determine the expediency of filing a complaint for perjury in a case where long delays and conflicting documentary evidence exist?

What is the effect of Section 479-A, Cr.P.C. on proceedings under Sections 476 to 479 when the alleged false evidence was not given as a witness in court?


Judgment

DUA, J.: This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated March 13. 1968 affirming the order of a learned single Judge of that Court directing that a complaint be filed against the appellant for his prosecution for making a false statement in para 10 of his affidavit dated July 6. 1960 to the effect that he had not been acting as Sarpanch till December 7, 1957.

2. The relevant facts necessary for understanding the controversy may now be briefly stated. Chajoo Ram, appellant, was elected Sarpanch of the Nyaya Panchayat of Risia Bazar, Tehsil Nanpora, District Bharaic at the election held for that office on October 29, 1956. Radhey Shyam (respondent in this Court) who was defeated in that election filed an election petition which was dismissed on June 3, 1958. During the trial of that petition an injunction was issued restraining the appellant from functioning as a Sarpanch. That order remained in force from December 3, 1956 to December 10, 1957. After the dismissal of the election petition, the appellant started functioning as Sarpanch. Several complaints also seem to have been made by Radhey Shyam a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top