Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, A.ALAGIRISWAMI, A.N.RAY, D.G.PALEKAR, K.K.MATHEW, P.N.BHAGWATI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Samsher Singh: Ishwar Chand Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgement
RAY, C. J.:- These two appeals are from the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
2. The Appellants joined the Punjab Civil Service (Judicial Branch). They were both on probation.
3. By an order dated 27 April, 1967 the services of the appellant Samsher Singh were terminated. The order was as follows:
"The Governor of Punjab is pleased to terminate the services of Shri Samsher Singh, Subordinate judge, on probation, under Rule 9 of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952 with immediate effect. It is requested that these orders may please be conveyed to the officer concerned under intimation to the Government.
4. By an order dated 15 December, 1969 the services of the appellant Ishwar Chand Aggarwal were terminated. The order was as follows:-
"On the recommendation of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to dispense with the services of Shri Ishwar Chand Agarwal, P.C.S. (Judicial Branch), with immediate effect, under Rule 7(3) in Part `D of the Punjab Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951, as amended from time to time.
5. The appellants contend that the Governor as the constitutional or the formal head
Gopi Kishore Prasad v. Union of India
Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
Bejoy Lakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of W. B.
referred to : Tribhuvandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel and other
relied on : Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
relied on : Purshottam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India
relied upon : State of orissa v. Ram Narayan Das
relied on : Madan Gopal v. State of Punjab
R. C. Banerjee v. Union of India
Champaklal G. Shah v. Union of India
explained and distinguished : Moti Ram Deka v. G. M. N. E. F. Rly. Maligaon, Pandu
explained and limited : Jayantilal Arnritlal Shodhan v. F. N. Rana
Overruled : State of U. P. v. Babu Ram Upadhya
Jagdish Mitter v. Union of India
criticised : J. P. Mitter v. chief justice. Calcutta
Brundaban Nayak v. Election Commission
Bejoy Lakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of W. B.
A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras
A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras
R. C. Cooper v. Union of India
K. H. Phadnis v. State of Maharashtra
Unioa of India v. Jyoti Prakash Mitter
K. N. Rajagopal v. M. Karunanidhi
State of Bihar v. Shiva Bhikshuk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.