M. H. BEG, P. S. KAILASAM
Official Liquidator – Appellant
Versus
Dharti Dhan Private LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
BEG, C.J.I. :- The Official Liquidator attached to the High Court of Rajasthan, in-charge of the liquidation of Golcha Properties (Pvt.) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as Golcha Company), has come up in appeal to this Court by special leave against a judgment and order of a Division Bench of that High Court, passed on a Special Appeal From the judgment and order of a singly Judge of that Court. On petitions presented on 4th July 1966 and 30th July 1966 by the creditors of Golcha Company, the High court had made a compulsory winding up order on 10th May 1968; and, on that very date, the appellant was appointed liquidator of the Golcha Company. The Dharti Dhan (Pvt. Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the Dhan Company), with its registered office at Bombay, was said to be one of the debtors of the Golcha Company to the extent of Rupees 11,69,043/-, together with interest and commission which was said to be still due on 1st August 1969. Agreements dated 25-6-66 and 17-1-67 between the two companies regulated the method of repayment by annual instalments of Rs. 2,50,000/- according to the appellant. As the respondent, Dhan Company, is said to have defaulted in the payment of two
Bhaiya Punjalal Bhagiwandin v. Dave Bhagwatprasad Prabhuprasad
State af U. P. v. Jogendra Singh
Sardar Govindrao v. State of M. P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.