SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.D. TULZAPURKAR, D.A. DESAI, AND A.P. SEN, JJ.
Gulam Abbas and others, Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. No. 4675 of 1978, D/-3-11-1981.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M.C. Bhandare, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. Urmila Kapoor, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, Mr. Hasan Imam, Shri Shanker Saran Lal and Miss Kamlesh Bansal, Advocates with him for Petitioners; Mr. O.P. Rana, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Markandeya, Advocate with him, for Respondents Nos. 1-4, Mr. Anil B. Dewan, Sr. Advocate, M/s. K.L. Hathi, P. Parmeswaran, P.C. Kapoor and M.A. Quadeer, Advocates with him for Respondents Nos. 5-6, Mr. Haider Abbas & Miss.Kamini Jaiswal, Advocates, for Respondent No.8 (Shia Waqf Board, U.P.) Mr. F.S. Nariman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. M. Qamaruddin, Mrs. M. Qamaruddin, Mr. Z. Jilani and Mrs. Shakil Ahmed, Advocates with him for Respondent No.7 (U.P. Sunni Central Board of Waqf). Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Advocate, for Intervener - Institute, for Re-writing History.
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - U. P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1960 - Section 5 (1) - Criminal Produce Code, 1973 - Section 144 - It may be stated that this Court by its order not merely granted permission to petitioners under Order I, R. 8, C. P. C. to institute this action qua themselves as representing Shia community and respondents 5 and 6 as representing Sunni community, but directed at certain stage of hearing that two Waqf Boards in U. P. State, namely, Shia Central Waqf Board and Sunni Central Waqf Board be impleaded as parties to petition as their presence was felt necessary for complete adjudication of controversy and even otherwise under Act, 1960, which has been done and both Waqf Boards have also been heard through their counsel in matter - Held, In fact, it was one of contentions of respondents 5 and 6 that before Allahabad High Court in earlier litigation then petitioners had misled Court into believing that Notification issued by the Shia Board on Ist of Dec. 1956 under Rule 54 (vii) was Notification under Section 5 (1) of Act, 1936. Moreover, additional material has come before us through both the Boards affording considerable assistance to us in arriving at proper conclusions in case - Plots and structures in question and respondents 5 and 6 and Sunni community of Mohalla Doshipura are permanently restrained by an injunction from interfering with exercise of said rights in any manner by petitioners or members of Shia community and respondents 1 to 4, particularly executive magistracy of varanasi is directed, if action under Sec. 144 Cr. P. C. is required to be taken to issue their orders under said provisions having regard to principles and guidelines indicated in that behalf in this judgment - Petition allowed.
Judgment
TULZAPURKAR, J. :- By this writ petition filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioners and through them the Shia community of Mohalla Doshipura, Varanasi are complaining against the various actions of the respondents (including respondents 5 and 6 as representing the Sunni community of Mohalla Doshipura) which constitute serious infraction and/or infringement of their fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Arts. 25 and 26 of the Constitution in the matter of enjoying their religious faith and performance of religious rites, practices and observances on certain plots and properties situated in the said Moballa of Doshipura, Police Station Jaitpura (formerly Adampur) in the city of Varanasi and in particular are seeking a declaration that the 9 plots of land bearing plot Nos. 245, 246, 247, 248/ 23/72, 602, 603, 602/1133, 246/1134 and 247/1130 in the said Mohalla and buildings and structures thereon belong to the Shia Waqf of Mohalla Doshipura and that the members of Shia community of that Mohalla have a right to perform their religious functions and practices on the said plots and structures thereon as also an appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to. 4 not to prohibit or restrain the Shias of the Mohalla from performing their religious functions and practices thereon. It may be stated that this Court by its order dated December 12, 1978 not merely granted permission to the petitioners under Order I, R. 8, C. P. C. to institute this action qua themselves as representing the Shia community and respondents 5 and 6 as representing Sunni community, but directed at certain stage of the hearing that the two Waqf Boards in U. P. State, namely, Shia Central Waqf Board and Sunni Central Waqf Board be impleaded as parties to the petition as their presence was felt necessary for complete adjudication of the controversy and even otherwise under the U. P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1960, which has been done and both the Waqf Boards have also been heard through their counsel in the matter.
2. In Mohalla Doshipura of Varanasi City there are two sects of Mahomedans - the Shias and the Sunnis. Both the sects revere the martyrdom of Hazrat Imam Hasan and Hazrat Imam Hussain, grandsons of Prophet Mohammed. during the Moharram but in a different manner. The case of the petitioners and through them of the Shias of Mohalla Doshipura is that the members of their sect numbering about 4000 constitute a religious denomination having a common faith and they observe Moharram for two months and eight days in a year in memory of Hazrat Imam Hussain who along with his 72, followers attained martyrdom at Karbala in Iraq. The said religious belief is practised by the men-folk and the women-folk of the Shia community by holding Mailises (religious discourses) Recitations, Nowhas, Marsia, doing Matam (wailing) and taking out processions with Tabut Tazia, Alams, Zuljinha, etc. For performing these religious rites, practices and observances the Shia community has been customarily using from time immemorial the nine plots in Moballa Doshipura and the structures on some of them, particulars whereof are as under :-
Plot No. 246 : on which stands a Mosque which, it is common ground, belongs to both the sects as it was constructed out of general subscription from members of both the sects and every Mohammadan is entitled to go in and perform his devotions according to the ritual of his own sect or school.
Plot No. 247/1130: on which stands the Baradari (Mardana Imambara. - a structure of white stone having 12 pillars) constructed by Shias in 1893 used for holding Majlises, Recitations, Marsia and doing other performances.
Plot No. 245 : on which there is a Zanana Imambara used by Shia ladies for mourning purposes and holding Majlises etc.
Plot No. 247 : on which there is Imam Chowk used for placing the Tazia thereon (said to have been demolished by the Sunnis during the pendency of the instant proceedi
relied on : Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra
Modhu Limaye v. Sub-Divl. Magistrate, Monghyr
Bondalapti Thatayya v. Gollapudi Basapayya
referred to : Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammned Amirabbas Abbasi v. State of M.B.
Parbhani Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. v. R.T.A.
Smt. Ujjam Bai v. State of U.P.
N.S. Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
relied on : Board of Muslim Wakfs v. Radha Krishna
Mst. Gulab Bai v. Manphool Bai
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh v. State of Bombay (now Gujarat)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.