SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 286

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK
Baldev Raj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
K.B.ROHTAGI, LALITA KOHLI, MANOJ SVARUP, S.RANGARAJAN

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, CJI. :— This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by Baldev Raj Sharma against an order of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana rejecting his application for enrolment as an advocate.

2. On 4 March, 1972 the petitioner passed the Bachelor of Arts examination from the Punjabi University, Patiala. In 1978 he joined the Bachelor of Laws (Academic) course in Kurukshetra University. The course is of two years duration. The petitioner completed the course and on 1 January, 1981 he was awarded the degree of Bachelor of Laws (Academic) by the Kurukshetra University. During the year 1981 the petitioner joined the LLB. (Professional) course in the third year in Kanpur University as a regular student. The Kanpur University confers two distinct degrees. LL.B. (General), which is a two year course, and LL.B. (Professional), which is a three year course. A person who has been awarded the LLB. (General) degree is eligible for admission to the LL B. (Professional) third year. The petitioner says that there is no distinction in the Rules and Regulations of the Kanpur University on whether LL.B. (General) course should be pursued by regular attendance or










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top